Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Oeconomicus who wrote (145606)	8/16/2002 3:05:53 PM
From: Lizzie Tudor	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

Liz, if they've been short for more than a couple months and less than 3 years, I think they've redeemed themselves. Don't you? Yes I do think that! I didn't mean to imply they weren't winning this year. But whats with the endless I told you so's! and this options thing too... lets debate it, sure it is an issue, one among many but its soooo tiring. This poster shows up on the sebl thread a week ago and posts a piece of news. This is what stock threads are for, to post news, imo. This short then retrieves some erroneous post that this same guy made in 2000 that he was "buying the dip" on rnwk at 300 or so. Who cares?! How many good fundamental posters have been chased off by these insecure individuals? You can't even discuss fundamentals of any company on the stock boards now. Wrt sebl, I bought the dip in the 8s- the stock rallied to 9.75 or so, I didn't sell because I'm LTBH but it was a 15% move and no real comments from the longs on that thread. Otoh if sebl fell to 6.9, the same % gain for a short (which is unlikely imo)- they all come out of the woodwork with this ridiculous backslapping as if they've caught "the big one". As the longs discovered the past 2 years, it matters not what you did in the past. I'm going to watch these shorts performance going forward, now. L