Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Booms, Busts, and Recoveries -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Oblomov who wrote (22729)	8/17/2002 1:37:06 AM
From: smolejv@gmx.net	Respond to of 74559

stand corrected. You can flame me next time I make this error - of course I have looked up both the English and American version and have them now in my links library. btw have not found any Bavarian version (yet;), just a straight german out of "Pennsylvanischer Staatsbote" of July 5, 1776: dhm.de dj

To: Oblomov who wrote (22729)	8/17/2002 1:16:16 PM
From: Alastair McIntosh	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 74559

Re: There is no such phrase in the Constitution. In fact, the reverse (slavery) was enshrined in the original document. Article I, Section 9 forbade Congress to forbid the slave trade (or as written, "the Migration or Importation of such Persons as any of the States now existing shall think proper to admit"). This was in effect for the first twenty years. In addition Article IV, Section 2 made the citizens of the "free" states complicit in the crime by obliging them to return any runaway "Person held to Service or Labour in one State" to "the Party to whom such Service or Labour may be due".