Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: TimF who wrote (149856)	8/16/2002 11:42:14 PM
From: Alighieri	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 1570299

You mean you haven't seen it?!? Where have you been hiding? I hope you are joking. If there was clear evidence, the administration would be beaming it on every TV channel of every nation. The hawks of hawks in Bush's cabinet still refer to Iraqi WMD with tentative conditional qualifiers. Lastly, what is the evidence that Saddam would use it against us? Al

To: TimF who wrote (149856)	8/17/2002 3:58:44 PM
From: tejek	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1570299

What is the evidence that we should be accepting? You mean you haven't seen it?!? Where have you been hiding? Tim, you make it sound like the building of nukes by Saddam is a fait accompli and they are mounting them on missiles as I write this post. Up til now, it my understanding that the closest we've come to locating MWD in Iraq were biological in nature. Of course, there have been several individuals who have said Saddam is close to a nuclear devise but no one has yet to locate the lab that is working on the problem. So to date, its been my understanding that we have been long on allegations and a little short on substance. If that's an incorrect observation, let me know. ted