To: Joe Stocks who wrote (43061 ) 8/19/2002 9:55:24 AM From: Nemer Respond to of 53068 Joe ... >>>>>, I may have been too harsh on ED but since he has me on "ignore" it allows me a little bit more leeway LOL you have a valid point there, I must admit ....ggggg as an observation, in the past, FOR ME ----- I have discovered that when I have put folks on ignore ****(and I currently have perhaps three-four dozen on SI) a) that I object HIGHLY to their outlook b) that I have not the ability to make them see my side of the discussion has ANY possibility of containing ANY correct basis c) they're verrrrrrrry stupid or a complete bore as to the underlying reason that Ed put you on ignore ----- I THINK, and this is MY interpolation of Ed's reasoning is that reason B has come into play ... for, again, in my estimation, not that it has ANY bearing on actual fact or truth, but only as I see it ... for, C is NOT applicable ....and I don't feel A is the underlying force ... and, there are other circumstances, also ...... but, enough of that ... as pertains to Ed having you on ignore, I feel that is HIS loss, NOT yours, for, I find "most" of your posts are ones from which I learn OR can learn OR give me pause to ponder .... I'll leave out the "few" which are not in the category of "most" .... hehehehehehe >>>>>Hopefully some will see it for what it is as cyclical bull rally in a secular bear market and take the op to lighten up some or if they think the market is going to continue to go up, put somne stop losses in place to lock in some profits. Just a thought. this statement is one of the "most" .... and I find it provokes me to consider MY thoughts in a differing light ..... I envy you for the drive and intensity of your convictions.. keep on posting as we ALL can learn from them ... or at least "most of them" .... hehehehehe Nemer