Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (38205)	8/16/2002 8:06:19 PM
From: Ilaine	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Frankly, I still assume it was and the Reagan folk thought so or they would have gotten an argument to the Supreme Court so fast it would have made Ollie North dizzy. You can't get arguments to the Supreme Court that fast. File in District court, brief it, have a hearing, case taken under advisement, letter opinion, motions to rehear, then appeal to the Court of Appeals, brief it, have a hearing, case taken under advisement, letter opinion, motions to rehear, then appeal to the Supreme Court, brief it, have a hearing, case taken under advisement, motions to rehear. Three years isn't unrealistic. If you know you're right, just do it and deal with the consequences. As I said, nobody was ever convicted of violating it, and Special Prosecutor Lawrence Walsh never even tried.