To: Ron Nairn who wrote (10584 ) 8/17/2002 9:21:12 AM From: axial Respond to of 14101 Hi, Ron - I think a lot of us have been wondering what's happening, at Dr. Pugen's site. At a guess, I believe the changes will be in anticipation of some very good results from the WF10 P3 (more on this later) - and the consequences of those good results. In the current climate of doubt, I've been reluctant to begin my posts on WF10. I believe everyone is focused on the question of Pennsaid approvals, and the time and effort involved in WF10 posts would be wasted. Now, we just know the following statement will be followed by screams of "Pumper!! - but I'll say it anyway. There are sound, logical reasons to believe the WF10 results will be very, very good: these reasons have been posted before, and will soon be reposted, in another form. Furthermore, the future for WF10 - and I know it seems improbable that this little-known compound will achieve this result - will be revealed to be far more important than most people think. Mark has always said that WF10 will have a profound impact. For many months, I disagreed with him (privately, and publicly) - until I caught up, on the research trail. I now believe he was right, and I join him in predicting that WF10 will turn out to be everything implied in di7026's Patent App post. I expect Priority Review for WF10: note - "expect" , not, "hope for". To get back to Dr. Pugen's WF10 site - it is my belief that they will eventually reflect the emerging realities of WF10. I don't believe (as some have posted) that it wil be simply a cosmetic change, of no importance. This is not an effort to "pump", or encouragement to buy DMX. It is the result of hundreds of hours of research, and represents my opinion, only. Regards, Jim