SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Investment Chat Board Lawsuits -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Stockbull who wrote (3552)8/19/2002 8:53:30 PM
From: EL KABONG!!!  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
Stockbull,

I take it, from your post, that you still believe in the tooth-fairy myths of OTC-BB stocks someday making it to the big boards. I had thought you were more intelligent than that.

KJC



To: Stockbull who wrote (3552)8/19/2002 11:35:24 PM
From: Jeffrey S. Mitchell  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 12465
 
Stockbull, for one example of "documented facts obtained from the public domain" click on this photo link: longandshortreports.com. I see a couple of mug shots of high-ranking GECC folk. From what I'm told, documentation of their transgressions was written about at great length on RB, often in "colorful" language.

Oh, sure, people do change, but as I like to say, spotting "troubled" companies is not about *proving* something is or is not true (that's what courts are for), rather, it's about spotting red flags. History has shown that leopards most often do not change their spots if you know what I mean. Add to that the recent SEC actions pursuant to GECC and I'd say anyone with money invested in GECC is going to very lucky to ever see it again.

BTW, was there any fact in particular you think was simply made up by longandshortreports.com?

- Jeff

A review of the posts cited as pointing to a conspiracy reveals that they consisted of documented facts obtained from the public domain, albeit expressed in the colorful style typical of message board culture.