SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (4835)8/19/2002 5:20:57 PM
From: H James Morris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
Isn't it amazing. Rich Beem six years ago was selling car stereos in Seattle at $7 an hour when Tiger Woods was signing a $45-million deal and turning pro.
Yesterday he made $990,000 and beat Tiger too.



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (4835)8/20/2002 4:50:47 AM
From: stockman_scott  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
RIDING THE NEXT SPECULATIVE WAVE

The advent of the jet ski has revolutionised big wave riding, allowing surfers the opportunity to chase the monster waves in search of an adrenalin rush along with the potential for bonanza cash rewards courtesy of major organisations. The explosion in complex derivative products, combined with the general acceptance of margin lending and short selling has enabled many risk adverse traders and investors alike the ability to generate significant profits and losses that are magnified based on the performance of an underlying security and/or commodity.

The infamous Nasdaq bubble that was inflated in late 1999, has now deflated despite the fact that many continue to cling to the near-term hope that capital investment and investor interest will experience an upswing and that a bottom is firmly in place. With the benefit of hindsight a grab bag of technology stocks purchased during the mid 90's, and held through to the final encore in March 2000 would have provided the potential for the equivalent of a first division lotto win.

History has shown that despite the calls of a more "sophisticated" market the mechanics of each speculative wave are somewhat similar. This was evident though researching the tulip craze in 1637, through to Bre-X that gave Canada a massive dose of gold fever in 1997. As momentum builds so to does the inflow of speculative funds chasing the opportunity to ride the wave in search of financial reward and the self-gratification one musters as their win/loss ratio indicates they are clearly nearing "guru" status.

It is not a matter of "if" the next speculative wave builds, it is simply a matter of "when". For those that witnessed first hand the potential windfall gains the Nasdaq bubble provided, the key now is to allocate funds towards the sector they feel will be the next to take off and again suck in new investors like a powerful vacuum.

THE MAJOR CANDIDATES

Gold
Amongst many investors gold would clearly rank as the sentimental favourite. The yellow metal has endured a painful 21 years after a vicious spike in excess of $800 in 1980, then a slide dominated by powerful short-term "bear market" rallies, central bank selling, short selling, hedging, and calls from mainstream analysts that it had lost its lustre in terms of its safe haven status. With the POG hovering between $298-$320oz, the gold bugs are finally starting to show some enthusiasm after countless false rallies that threatened to break the back of even the most hardened gold fan. The great gold bear market has coincided with one of the greatest bull markets in history that engulfed the Dow Jones, and resulted in a rush to US assets by overseas investors. Gold's negative correlation with the $US has provided the foundation for analysts to suggest that the metal is in fact in the infant stages of the long-term bull market and that the $US is about to experience a period of decline. The efforts of GATA have been well documented, along with the revelations of considerable exposure to gold-based derivatives that will run into difficulty based on a breach of the $354 level. Gold has the uncanny ability to send investors hearts racing, and at the first sniff of the next major discovery the junior sector could well again be ignited in similar fashion to the Gawler Craton boom in 1996.

Whilst the performance of gold and the companies involved in exploration and production is more widely covered in the mainstream media, I would expect silver to outperform gold on a percentage basis with the lack of viable investment opportunities in the Australian silver sector a key factor. I rate gold as a clear second favourite behind silver, despite the likelihood of a much more significant participant rate in gold that will be nullified by a vast array of investment alternatives.

SILVER
The so called "poor man's gold" has had a torrid time along with its partner in crime, after the much publicised events surrounding the Hunt brothers which sent the POS to $52.50oz in 1980. Despite 11 years of deficit, and significant short positions relative to the entire silver market, the spot price continues to struggle despite a recent spike over $5.00oz. The US government has also signed a bill, where silver will be purchased on market to fund coinage programs based on the virtual exhaustion of the country's stockpile. It would be expected that silver would follow gold's lead, however more recently it has shown some tentative signs of disassociating itself with gold although the recent sell mirrored gold's near-term bout of the wobbles.

Silver rates highly in terms of compelling supply/demand fundamentals, combined with the potential for significant increases in investment demand as speculators seek a perceived cheaper alternative to gold-based investments. Silver is my number one selection, although a rising gold price is likely to be the initial catalyst. The current POS weakness (below $4.50) could well be with the benefit of hindsight an excellent entry point into physical or oversold silver equities. During the recent price spike, I noted a growing interest on Australian finance forums, and would expect the momentum to build significantly on any short-term rallies.

PLATINUM GROUP METALS
The PGM's enjoyed strong rallies from mid 1999 to early 2001, however the activity in Australia was somewhat limited due to the lack of investment opportunities. Whilst the share price of Aquarius Platinum (AQP) moved from below 50c to eventually peak at $10.95, the majority of PGM explorers arrived late at the party and could only catch the tail end of the price activity and renewed investor interest. Platinum's industrial uses as well as medical and jewellery could provide support, and there have been suggestions that it could in fact lead both gold and silver higher. Whilst a major rally across the PGM's cannot be discounted, the major factor going against it is the fact that prices only really came off the boil last year.

MISCELLANEOUS AND TITANIUM MINERALS
This is the sector that could yet provide the surprise packet, and take away some of the limelight from both gold and silver. With tantalum remaining weak, there has been some attention directed towards magnesium with major projects in Australia to come on stream. Growth in titanium minerals is expected to increase gradually in 2003, however the sector must rank as an outsider in terms of being part of the next speculative wave. A squeeze in uranium was widely tipped in 1998 to occur in the short-medium term, however in Australia apart from environmental and political issues there has not been any significant interest in the sector.

There could well be new uses discovered for relatively unknown commodities however it would take time for some companies to dust off old tenements and announce that they may indeed be prospective for a wider range of resources. There are very few companies in Australia that are focused on rare earths and other commodities as the majority tend to focus on the more conventional gold and base metals plays in terms of their diversity.

Some research into more non-conventional commodities and companies exploring and/or producing them could prove fruitful overtime, and if it is not gold and silver I would expect the next speculative wave to come from some of the lesser likes in terms of investor attention.

DIAMONDS
The diamond sector tends to be a hit and miss affair, as those companies that are successful in exploration are well rewarded with considerable profit margins and market capitalisations to match. The last significant diamond boom in Australia occurred in 1994 with Cambridge Gulf leading the charge of a number of junior hopefuls. There has since been a host of new entrants (producers in South Africa), whilst there has been some active pegging occurring in the Northern Territory in particular, and some new entrants waiting to list on the ASX. The sector as a whole is extremely unpredictable and could well be warming up to another burst of speculative fever. (It has been eight years after all).

The sector tends to be very unpopular with a fair percentage of speculative participants during quiet periods, however once a positive trend is established I would expect this situation to change quickly. Rates highly, however the sector has the ability to provide significant rewards or continue to bitterly disappoint the longer-term holders.

OIL AND ENERGY
Whilst the oil price recovered strongly from the $11US level, the one ingredient missing in Australia was the major discoveries. Whilst the major producers were greeted with re-ratings, the junior sector failed to spark and as a result there were only a handful of significant discoveries and subsequent share price re-ratings. The current Middle East tension could well have a more immediate impact, however with the US economy struggling for momentum a high oil price would certainly not be on the agenda.

The speculative fever in the energy sector could well be related to more regional discoveries as opposed to the sector enjoying a broader based rally.

SOFT COMMODITIES
Whilst Eddy Murphy in "Trading Places" had great joy out of orange juice it would be hard to see a widespread boom engulfing the sector, unless of course there are new medical applications (dietary included), and everyone rushes to purchase the products, which provide financial windfalls to the manufacturers. There has been considerable interest in the cocoa market, and some apprehension as to whether or not the price of a "mars bar" would increase as a result.

DOW AND S&P
Both of these have literally had bull markets to rival a "life sentence". Major bull market simply to not begin with P/E's in excess of 20X, and for many precious metals bugs it is a case of 'wake me up when they are sub 10".

SUMMARY AND CONCLUSION
There is an old saying that "The best investments are the ones the majority do not own", and this is certainly relevant to speculative investment as not everyone can become wealthy beyond their wildest imagination in a market "bubble". There always exist the potential for breakthroughs in medicine and technology, significant mineral discoveries and also the potential for derivatives disasters and attempts to corner certain markets. Stock market speculation is high risk/high reward, and for many the major obstacle is keeping the faith despite lengthy time periods between rallies, and price trends that tend to defy all fundamental reasoning. My rankings in order for the next speculative wave, will differ greatly from others, however a key theme that should remain constant is investing in quality companies and importantly people that will prosper in any market condition.

1. Silver
2. Gold
3. Diamonds
4. Platinum Group Metals
5. Miscellaneous and Titanium Minerals
6. Commodities (base metals)
7. Oil and Energy
8. Biotech and Healthcare
9. Soft Commodities
10. Technology Stocks
11. Dow and S&P

Tony Locantro
locantro@iinet.net.au

20 August 2002

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Tony Locantro is a client advisor in Perth, Australia, and the author of "The Green Room", A Guide To Speculating on the Australian Stock Market. Tony was previously a major contributor to Australian Internet forums under the nick "Budfox" from 1998-2001. Stocks mentioned in this article are for illustration purposes only and do not represent investment advice. The author has both direct and indirect interests in stocks mentioned in the article and these may change without notice.

click on the link and see the charts mentioned in this article
gold-eagle.com



To: Jim Willie CB who wrote (4835)8/20/2002 5:03:52 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Global Economy Looks Fragile As Optimism for Rebound Fades

New Data From U.S., Germany Add Strokes To a Darker Picture of Recovery's Strength

By DAVID WESSEL and G. THOMAS SIMS
Staff Reporters of THE WALL STREET JOURNAL
August 20, 2002

The outlook for the global economy is deteriorating amid fading optimism that this year will see a smart rebound from the slowdown that began two years ago.

Monday brought more disappointing economic news, confirming that the U.S. recovery is still shaky and that the rest of the industrialized world isn't faring much better.

The U.S. index of leading indicators, a compilation of economic data that is designed to foreshadow the direction of the economy, fell 0.4%, the third decline in the past four months.

And Germany's central bank estimated that Germany, the world's third-largest economy, grew at an annual rate of just 1% in the second quarter. "As long as the economy hasn't gained strength and momentum, it remains vulnerable to new shocks, be they external or homemade," the Bundesbank warned. Second-quarter growth, which doesn't reflect the economic harm of recent flooding, was barely faster than the sluggish pace of the first quarter and only slightly better than slow second-quarter growth reported recently for Italy and the Netherlands. The U.S. economy grew at a 1.1% pace in the second quarter.

"There's a sense of disappointment that things haven't gotten better in the world economy," former Federal Reserve governor Laurence Meyer says. The U.S. economy "basically has been flat" since a surge at the very beginning of the year, he says. "You've got Latin America stressed out. You've got the euro area struggling to get back to trend growth, which is very low anyhow. The only bright spot is non-Japan Asia."

'Vicious Cycle'

No single development accounts for the darkening picture. Nearly everything that has occurred since the beginning of the summer has been an economic negative. "This is the vicious cycle," says Mr. Meyer, who is now at the Center for Strategic and International Studies, a Washington think tank. "The rest of the world needs us and we need them and neither one is helping each other."

"We were looking for some improvement in the second half," says David Hensley, an economist at J.P. Morgan Chase Bank in New York. But it isn't materializing. The pickup in global manufacturing that J.P. Morgan economists had been anticipating didn't show up. Stock markets have been weak and not just because of accounting scandals in the U.S. "All over the world," Glenn Hubbard, chairman of the White House Council of Economic Advisers, said recently, "money is flowing into safe assets."

Consumer spending in Europe continues to be disappointing. Japanese workers are being squeezed by corporate restructurings and Japanese exporters are being squeezed by the soaring yen. And oil prices, which usually fall when the economy weakens, instead are hovering around $30 a barrel because of uneasiness about a possible U.S. attack on Iraq.

Just seven weeks ago, at the beginning of the summer, economists at J.P. Morgan Chase were predicting that the world's other developed economies would expand at a 3.2% annual rate in the second half of this year. Now they are forecasting growth of 2.15% because of the bleaker outlook for the U.S. and Europe and renewed pessimism about Japan. The economies of the developed world grew at a 2.4% pace in this year's first half.

They have made similar changes to their forecast for developing countries, largely because of the deteriorating economies of Latin America. Instead of growth of nearly 4% in the second half -- the early summer prediction for the developing world -- the economists now expect just 2.6%. They think the economies of Latin America will grow at an annual rate of just 0.7% in the second half of the year. In contrast, the economies in Asia outside of Japan are expected to grow by better than 4%, but they will have difficulty sustaining that pace unless demand from the U.S., Europe and Japan strengthens.

Similar rethinking about the near-term prospects is under way at the International Monetary Fund, which is preparing a new semiannual forecast to be released at the end of next month. Back in April, the International Monetary Fund marked up its post-Sept. 11 forecast for the world economy and pointed hopefully to "increasing signs that the global economic slowdown, which began in the middle of 2000, has bottomed out, most clearly in the U.S. and to a lesser extent in Europe." In its semiannual World Economic Outlook, it said, "Growing expectations of recovery have been particularly apparent in financial markets."

The tone of the new IMF forecast is almost certain to be gloomier.

The new German data underscore the weakness of the global economy outside the U.S. Strikes at auto makers, rising unemployment and stingy corporate investment spending hindered growth and the recovery from last year's recession, the Bundesbank said. Consumer spending helped growth in the second quarter, but the central bank warned that sagging stock markets may undermine confidence. And exports, one of the drivers of what little growth Germany enjoyed in the second quarter, depend on the elusive rebound in the U.S. and elsewhere.

The Bundesbank, using the European conventions for reporting economic data, said the German economy grew by 0.25% in the second quarter, compared with the first, marginally faster than the 0.2% growth in the first quarter. In the U.S., quarterly changes are usually converted to annual rates. Germany's government statistics office will publish the official growth estimate Thursday.

The German Banking Federation said that it is cutting its growth forecast for 2002 for the 12 countries that share the euro to 1% from 1.4%. The trade association marked down its forecast for German growth for the year to a meager 0.5% from 1.0%.

The European Central Bank, meanwhile, appears even more reluctant than the Federal Reserve in the U.S. to cut interest rates further to stimulate the economy. The Bush administration is flirting with new tax cuts that would be crafted to offset some of the damage done by the stock market's drop. But the German government, already under pressure from the European Commission in Brussels to limit the size of its budget deficit, Monday delayed [Euro]6.9 billion ($6.8 billion) of income-tax cuts planned for 2003 to finance flood repairs in eastern Germany.

In the U.S., the very slow growth in payrolls and the decelerating pace of wage gains threatens to pinch household income. Household wealth has been whacked by the weak stock market. And business investment spending is restrained by "a sense of pessimism and a reluctance to take risks," says Mr. Meyer, the former Fed governor. Consumer spending and housing have been impressively resilient, and another round of no-interest financing by auto makers will help the economy in the current quarter. "But," he says, "the only way to keep the economy going in the fourth quarter is to get a significant rebound in business fixed investment, and that doesn't seem to be in train."

Compounding all this are recent revisions of history by the economic scorekeepers at the Commerce Department. Their new numbers describe a recession that was longer and deeper than the earlier numbers suggest. That doesn't show much about the economy's future direction, of course, but it underscores the vulnerability of the U.S. economy.

"The boom," Mr. Meyer says, "was unique. And the downturn was unique. We're in a post-bubble economy. The lesson from Japan is that it's very difficult to figure out the forces that interact with each other."

Write to David Wessel at david.wessel@wsj.com and G. Thomas Sims at tom.sims@wsj.com