Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (150004)	8/19/2002 5:28:38 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1569730

You are out of it........you infer that you're comparing a case involving K. lay and M. Lewinsky with Clinton and M. Lewinsky, and then turnaround and say the comparison case is Clinton and Paula Jones of which I know little about the particulars. How can you claim that Clinton's lie was "about sex" when you don't know even the basics of the lawsuit that was involved? Hiding the publisher of an article, implying one case when you mean another etc are differing levels of deceit I don't know what you're referring to, but I've never hidden the publisher of an article. I think my reference was perfectly clear in the analogy between the hypothetical and the Jones case. That's fine; we'll drop this thread as it is unproductive -- I think I made my point very clearly and I think you're perspective has shown through.