SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: maceng2 who wrote (4849)8/19/2002 10:44:17 PM
From: sylvester80  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
I wonder how many dogs, cats and chimps, the US biological weapons and drug industry kills each year? Do you know? Or maybe they test their products only directly on human subjects instead? Any idea?



To: maceng2 who wrote (4849)8/19/2002 11:22:06 PM
From: sylvester80  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 89467
 
BTW my question has nothing to do with the tapes which were quite disturbing in general. But since I also believe in animal rights I thought I'd ask if anyone knew how many animals get killed each year by tests of the US biological program and the US drug/cosmetic/medical/what have you industry. I know the british have exposed quite a few US companies for their unethical treatment of animals. I thought maybe someone can put a number to it if they knew how these companies and agencies do their testing.



To: maceng2 who wrote (4849)8/20/2002 2:33:14 AM
From: stockman_scott  Respond to of 89467
 
Mayor Bush of the Potemkin Village of Economyville

By Molly Ivins
Syndicated Columnist
Posted on Sun, Aug. 18, 2002


WACO - The President's Economic Forum held here Tuesday raises the question, "By how much don't they get it?"

The range of opinion at this shindig went from A to B. This wasn't a forum - it was a pep rally. Sis-Boom-Bah City for the old cheerleader. President Bush said Baylor University "put on a good show." Got to agree. It was one of the most sophisticated phony political events I have ever witnessed.

Such attention to the details of stagecraft - the lovely flag painting behind them at the plenary session, the helpful hints on the backdrops: "Corporate Responsibility," "Better Health Care," etc., for those too dumb to figure it out from the vapid speeches. The wonderfully artificial inclusion of "real people" - all of whom just happen to think George W. Bush is divine.

This Potemkin Village of diversity lacked just one thing: anyone with a good idea. Any 10 ex-employees of Enron could come up with a long list of recommendations on how to fix things so this doesn't happen again. But they weren't invited.

The country is in a world of economic trouble because of an immense tax cut for the rich and 20 years of deregulation. So everyone at Potemkin Village favored more tax cuts for the rich and slashing that terrible government regulation that is strangling big business today.

We could dismiss this exercise in complacent stupidity for the silly political charade that it actually was, but there was a real danger at Waco, too: the horrible possibility that Bush actually believes that was a cross section of America.

Searching out the few grains of sense in that sea of twaddle, I found Charles W. Schwab of the eponymous brokerage firm making one excellent recommendation.

Although he surely dislocated his shoulder from patting himself on the back, he is quite right about "building a Chinese wall" between those who recommend stocks and the investment banking end of the big financial firms. (This was also described as "building a firewall" so often that one befuddled participant wound up calling it "a Chinese firewall.")

This would theoretically prevent brokers from urging their clients to buy stocks that they privately describe as "dogs" and "crap" just so they can get a cut of the investment banking fees. Schwab suggested that the Securities and Exchange Commission mandate the creation of these Chinese firewalls and then require the financial firms to certify that they are in place. Unkind people might describe that as a (gasp!) regulation.

Muriel Siebert of another eponymous firm, a peppy dame (upon hearing herself described as "a legend," she said, "As long as I'm a living legend"), teed off on derivatives - the only participant I heard do so. It's good to know that the crying need for regulation of derivatives has not gone entirely unnoticed.

One participant from the construction industry in the "Job Creation" panel actually uttered the words "need for affordable housing." An alert Democrat, if there is one, would smell the beginnings of a happy coalition there.

In the meantime, the president dropped in on the assorted gabfests, repeating the same fatuous remarks. "I want a self-regulating [financial] industry" ... "I want to see a self-policing industry."

I want to see pigs fly.

Faith-based securities regulation - it is a concept. "Apart from the government," he began at one seminar, "what can we do?" Is he the president of something besides the government?

Although the most striking feature of the pointless gabfest was what wasn't heard - not a soul mentioned expensing stock options - there were also some breathtaking whoppers.

Ann Combs, an assistant secretary of labor, said, "Our [private] pension system is the envy of the world." Fifty percent of Americans have no pension at all other than Social Security.

OK, let's do a quick review of things that might have been considered at the Economic Forum had any real people been there: giving workers the right to elect the trustees of their retirement funds, making all corporate directors independent, forbidding management to spend company funds on electing its preferred candidates, banning stock options entirely, repeal the banking deregulation act, holding the rest of the tax cut, stopping loans on 401(k)s ...

Darn, out of space already.

________________________________________________

Molly Ivins writes for Creators Syndicate. 5777 W. Century Blvd., Suite 700, Los Angeles, CA 90045

dfw.com



To: maceng2 who wrote (4849)8/20/2002 11:52:30 AM
From: sylvester80  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 89467
 
I think I found it... Military Testing: The Unseen War

Military Testing: The Unseen War

peta.org

When news reports tally the casualties of war, or when monuments are erected to honor soldiers, the other-than-human victims of war--the animals whose bodies are shot, burned, poisoned, and otherwise tortured in tests to create even more ways to kill people--are never recognized, nor is their suffering well known. The 1987 movie "Project X" offered only a glimpse of the kind of experiments that go on far from public view but at taxpayer expense.

Uncounted Casualties

The U.S. military inflicts the pains of war on hundreds of thousands of animals each year in experiments. The Department of Defense (DOD) and the Veterans Administration (VA) together are the federal government's second largest user of animals (after the National Institutes of Health). They account for nearly half the estimated minimum of 1.6 million dogs, cats, guinea pigs, hamsters, rabbits, primates, rats, mice, and "wild animals" used, as reported to Congress in 1983, the last year for which government figures are available.(1) Because these figures don't include experiments that were contracted out to non-governmental laboratories, or the many sheep, goats, and pigs often shot in wound experiments, the actual total of animal victims is probably much higher.

The House Armed Services Committee voiced its concern "about the use of animals in medical and other defense-related research" in its report on the National Defense Authorization Act for fiscal year 1995.(2) At committee hearings, DOD revealed that its use of animals in experiments has increased 36% in the past decade, but that it spent $180 million on research using 553,000 animals in the last fiscal year.(3)

Top Secret

Military testing is classified "Top Secret," and it is very hard to get current information. From published research, we know that armed forces facilities all over the United States test all manner of weaponry on animals, from Soviet AK-47 rifles to biological and chemical warfare agents to nuclear blasts. Military experiments can be acutely painful, repetitive, costly, and unreliable, and they are particularly wasteful because most of the effects they study can be, or have already been, observed in humans, or the results cannot be extrapolated to human experience.

Sample Experiments

Burns and Blasts: In 1946, near the Bikini Atoll in the South Pacific, 4,000 sheep, goats, and other animals loaded onto a boat and set adrift were killed or severely burned by an atomic blast detonated above them. The military nicknamed the experiment "The Atomic Ark."(4)

At the Army's Fort Sam Houston, live rats were immersed in boiling water for 10 seconds, and a group of them were then infected on parts of their burned bodies.(5)

In 1987, at the Naval Medical Institute in Maryland, rats' backs were shaved, covered with ethanol, and then "flamed" for 10 seconds.(6)

In 1988, at Kirkland Air Force Base in New Mexico, sheep were placed in a loose net sling against a reflecting plate, and an explosive device was detonated 19 meters away. In two of the experiments, 48 sheep were blasted: the first group to test the value of a vest worn during the blast, and the second to see if chemical markers aided in the diagnosis of blast injury (they did not).(7)

Radiation: At the Armed Forces Radiobiology Research Institute in Maryland, nine rhesus monkeys were strapped in chairs and exposed to total-body irradiation. Within two hours, six of the nine were vomiting, hypersalivating, and chewing.(8) In another experiment, 17 beagles were exposed to total-body irradiation, studied for one to seven days, and then killed. The experimenter concluded that radiation affects the gallbladder.(9)

At Brooks Air Force Base in Texas, rhesus monkeys were strapped to a B52 flight simulator (the "Primate Equilibrium Platform"). After being prodded with painful electric shocks to learn to "fly" the device, the monkeys were irradiated with gamma rays to see if they could hold out "for the 10 hours it would take to bomb an imaginary Moscow." Those hit with the heaviest doses vomited violently and became extremely lethargic before being killed.(10)

Diseases: To evaluate the effect of temperature on the transmission of the Dengue 2 virus, a mosquito-transmitted disease that causes fever, muscle pain, and rash, experiments conducted by the U.S. Army at Fort Detrick, Md., involved shaving the stomachs of adult rhesus monkeys and then attaching cartons of mosquitoes to their bodies to allow the mosquitoes to feed.(11)

Experimenters at Fort Detrick have also invented a rabbit restraining device that consists of a small cage that pins the rabbits down with steel rods while mosquitoes feast on their bodies.(12)

Wound Labs: The Department of Defense has operated "wound labs" since 1957. At these sites, conscious or semiconscious animals are suspended from slings and shot with high-powered weapons to inflict battlelike injuries for military surgical practice. In 1983, in response to public pressure, Congress limited the use of dogs in these labs, but countless goats, pigs, and sheep are still being shot, and at least one laboratory continues to shoot cats. At the Army's Fort Sam Houston "Goat Lab," goats are hung upside down and shot in their hind legs. After physicians practice excising the wounds, any goat who survives is killed.(13)

Other forms of military experiments include subjecting animals to decompression sickness, weightlessness, drugs and alcohol, smoke inhalation, and pure oxygen inhalation.

Animal Intelligence

The Armed Forces conscript various animals into intelligence and combat service, sending them on "missions" that endanger their lives and well-being. The Marine Corps teaches dogs "mauling, snarling, sniffing, and other suitable skills" needed to search for bombs and drugs.(14)

Thousands of animals also fall victim to military operations and even military fashion. A series of Navy tests of underwater explosives in the Chesapeake Bay in 1987 killed more than 3,000 fish(15), and habitats for hundreds of species have been destroyed by nuclear tests in the South Pacific and the American Southwest.

And as if weapons tests didn't kill enough animals, the Air Force recently awarded a New Jersey company $5.2 million to manufacture 53,000 leather flight jackets, in an effort to "enhance esprit" among its pilots. At 3-1/2 goat skins per jacket, the result will be that 185,500 African goats will lose their lives so that U.S. pilots can sport a World War II "look."(16)

References

"Alternatives to Animal Use in Research, Testing, and Education," U.S. Office of Technology Assessment, 1986, pp. 50-51.
Krizmanic, Judy, "Military Increases Animal Experiments," Vegetarian Times, August 1994.
Ibid.
Tom Regan, "We Are All Noah," 1985.
Burleson, "Flow Cytometric Measurement of Rat Lymphocite Subpopulations After Burn Injury and Injury With Infection," Archives of Surgery, 122:216.
Wretland, et al., "Role of Exotoxin A and Elastase in the Pseudomonas Aeruginosa Strain PAO Experimental Mouse Burn Infection," Microbial Pathogenesis, 2:397, 1987.
Phillips, et al., "Cloth Ballistic Vest Alters Response to Blast," Journal of Trauma, Jan. 28, 1988.
Dubas, et al., "Effect of Ionizing Radiation on Prostaglandins and Gastric Secretion in Rhesus Monkeys," Radiation Research, 110:289, 1987.
Durakovic, "Hepatobiliary Kinetics After Whole Body Irradiation," Military Medicine, 151(9):487.
"Obscure Office Drafts World War III Script," Washington Post, May 27, 1984.
Watts, et al., "Effect of Temperature on the Vector Efficiency of Aedes Aegypti for Dengue 2 Virus," American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene, 36(1):143, 1987.
Dobson, et al., "A Device for Restraining Rabbits While Bloodfeeding Mosquitoes," Laboratory Animal Science, 37(3):364, 1987.
"Goats Shot to Teach Army Doctors Skills," Williamsport Sun-Gazette, March 5, 1986.
"Uncle Sam Wants You, Too, Fido," Time, June 18, 1984, p. 33.
"Fish Deaths Cancel Navy Blast Tests," Washington Post, October 1, 1987.
"Air Force Needs a Few Goat Jackets," San Francisco Chronicle, April 8, 1988.