SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : Raymond L. Dirks Internet Research Tribunal Thread -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (161)8/20/2002 7:42:10 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 544
 
THE NEW**RAYMOND L. DIRKS/SKY CAPITAL TRIBUNAL THREAD**
Subject 53247



To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (161)9/17/2002 6:25:05 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 544
 
2. 01-00926 Abstract: Award NASD Dispute Resolution, Inc. In the Matter of the Arbitration Between: Elmer D. Carlsoa, Diann M. Carlson, and Super Sound Tapes, Inc. (Claimants) vs. Security Capital Trading, Inc. Dirks & Company, Inc. Katherine Kierce Bader. Jessy Dirks, Robert Goss, and Vincent Piazza, (Respondents) Case
Size: 564545bytes

scan.cch.com



To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (161)9/18/2002 9:04:21 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 544
 
We're dedicated to bringing you, the Stock-Line community, the very best investment ideas. Stock-Line will be bringing you exclusive interviews with the best investment minds on, and off Wall Street.
web.archive.org.

All investment involves risk. See this IMPORTANT NOTICE.

July 16, 1997

David Morris
Ray Dirks Research / National Securities Corp.

We recently spoke with David Morris, CFA, and CPA, who is an analyst at the legendary Ray Dirks Research, a division of National Securities. In this exclusive interview David Morris reveals what could be the next "ten-bagger"…

S-L: Tell us a little bit about Ray Dirks Research.

DM: Ray Dirks is the research arm of National Securities. National's a 50-year-old firm. It's a publicly traded firm. It trades under the symbol NATS on the NASDAQ. There's around 250, 300 registered reps in the firm, spread out over the 50 offices. The headquarters is in Seattle, with major branches are Spokane, Chicago, and New York.

S-L: Ray Dirks Research is legendary on the Street for picking some of the really all-time big winners - stocks which have gone up a literally a hundred-fold. David, tell us about some of your recent hits, and which stock you think could be the next big winner?

DM: At my previous firm, I wrote up Soft Key International (NASDAQ: SKEY). That did very well. I believe my write up originated at $3-1/2. The stock eventually went to the equivalent of $40. I wrote up a company called Bio Dental (NASDAQ: BDTC) at that firm, and it went from $1.00 to $7.00. Another success I had at the previous firm was a company called ATC Communications, which I wrote up at $3.00 and went to $25. It's since come down. But it should do well again.

I've had some successes bringing in corporate finance clients to my previous firm and to this firm. I'm here a year. I brought in a company called Eurotech(OTC BB: EURO). It hit an adjusted high of $13; I started with it at an adjusted price of $1.00. Another company I brought in, which another analyst wrote up, was Employee Solutions. That went from $10 to the adjusted price of about $80. And I've had several losers, which I will not go into at this time!

S-L: David, give us the next big winner that we could see move 500-1,000%.

DM: Well, Titan (OTC BB: IMPN)($1 1/8 July 16) can certainly move 500 to 1,000 percent over a period of time. Titan trades for $3-1/2 a share now. It was formerly known as Oil Retrieval Systems. It owns 40% of a company called Oilex, (OTC BB: OLEX) on which I have recently written what I consider to be a major report on a micro-cap company. I was attracted to it because of its reserves. Oilex is trading for $0.50 cents on the OTC Bulletin Board right now.

S-L: David, tell us a little bit about your background.

DM: I've been an analyst following principally petroleum stocks for about 25 years now. Prior to that I was with Mobile for a while. I'm both a CFA and a CPA. I look for some real gems among the very, very small companies. That's how I came to find Oilex, which seemed to have an unusually large amount of proven, producing and probable reserves in the ground. Plus, their projections for production and earnings were also quite attractive to me. So I did some research on the company, and came up with a rather lengthy research report.

DM: Oilex has assembled proven, producing and probable reserves of 27-1/2 million barrels of oil, and 20-1/2 billion cubic feet of oil. I obtained the engineering reports which made those estimates. Oilex has 27 million outstanding shares. So if you valued each barrel of oil in the ground at a dollar, the stock is still worth double what it's selling for. I mean, a dollar is absurd. Wall Street will normally value oil in the ground at $6 a barrel.

Oil in the ground is normally worth 9 or $10 a barrel, depending upon the producing life of the reservoir. You would want to give at least $3-4 a barrel to Oilex's reserves. The gas is worth another $10 million, besides the oil. But that's just Oilex we're talking about. And it doesn't, if you've read my report, give effect to the potential acquisition of Geronimo, and it doesn't give effect to the combination with Titan.

S-L: Tell us a little bit more about that transaction…

DM: Titan manufactures the swabbing units, which are mobile units that go out into the field and perform a swabbing operation -- which takes only about 10 minutes per well, and greatly enhances the production of what was believed by usually their former owner to be a fully depleted oil well; at least in the sense that the former owner believed that no more oil was economically obtainable from the well. It's not as simple as that. You just don't go in with a swabbing unit and expect to find more oil. There are certain other steps which Oilex management has seen fit to introduce to its operation. That'll also contribute to enhancing the production and the oil obtainable from each well.

S-L: Now, Titan (OTC BB: IMPN) essentially will take control of Oilex?

DM: That's correct. The attraction would be the ability to have sort of a first call on the swabbing units as they're produced. Oilex is going to need a great deal of them. But Oilex management fully expects that the demand for these units is going to increase geometrically as we move forward, as the price of oil increases. Don't forget, we're talking about today's price of energy, which is about $19 a barrel. As we move on and the price gets higher, stripper production becomes that much more attractive and that much more economical to go after.

Titan has also recently announced the acquisition of certain of the wells of Rife Energy. They will acquire 650 wells of from Rife; with 84-1/2 million barrels of oil in place. Yes, this is more stripper production. The engineers have carefully analyzed the ability to obtain a great deal more oil from that production than anybody else has till now. The reserve estimates -- I know they're a little hard to swallow -- but the reserve estimates were made by T. Haas Petroleum engineers, and they're a well reputed firm as far as I know.

S-L: What are the reserves?

DM: 84 million barrels of oil in place. On that, we would figure probably about a 40 percent recovery rate, if T. Haas is correct.

S-L: So bottom line, David, what would that imply that Titan should be trading at right now?

DM: Well, I didn't want to get into that exactly. It's a little too high. But let's just say, I think the company is worth anywhere from $10 to $20 a share, based on the reserves they have in place right now; that we estimate based on the new recovery method will be recovered. I would say it could be worth anywhere between 10 and $20 a share. If you just gave $2 a barrel, you would have $160 million worth of oil in the ground, with 13.5 million shares outstanding. That's well over $10 a barrel.

S-L: The obvious question then is: Why is the stock, trading at these low prices? And what would it take - what would be the trigger to get it to your projected prices?

DM: That's my favorite question. And it's the key question in this whole analysis. This has been primarily a blue chip market. Very, very few micro-cap companies, particularly Bulletin Board companies have done very much in this stock market environment. That's number one. Number two. Stripper production is always on a "show me" type of basis. There have been very few oil companies who have been so to speak "paid in advance" by the market for acquiring large amounts of stripper production, secondary production.

Now, what will it take to make the market realize that he's got it and it's going to work? The announcement of a few months of production with the methods that Oilex and Titan management have been talking about at their recent seminars, meetings if you will, with Wall Street brokers and analysts.

S-L: So we can expect that as Titan continues production that the price of the stock should rise in step?

DM: I think so. I consider this to be quite an interesting speculative buy, with a lot of upside potential. It's not for everybody. You've got to consider it risky. We don't want to sell the stock to widows and orphans.

S-L: Will your "Buy" on Oilex pass through to Titan now that Titan is picking up the Oilex assets?

DM: Absolutely. When I said there are 84.5 million barrels of oil in place, all I was talking about for Titan was the Rife Energy acquisition. I wasn't talking about the 27-1/2 million barrels that Oilex holds. I wasn't talking about the 20-1/2 billion cubic feet that Oilex holds.

S-L: So for investors, the play right now is Titan?

DM: At the current price, yes. You would buy Titan at the current price. Because there is essentially no premium or no discount for buying Oilex. Titan has less shares and has more oil in place. Of course its shares sell for six times the price of Oilex. But basically there is no premium at the current time. The play would be Titan.

S-L: What about the possibility of going onto NASDAQ and off the Bulletin Board for Titan?

DM: Well, it's excellent. They meet the requirements right now, as far as I could see. If their price holds around 3-1/2, they meet the current requirements. Those requirements could go up to $4 soon. But I believe that right now they would qualify.

S-L: That could be another trigger for moving the stock. Obviously once it gets into a more liquid marketplace, we could see the value realized. What do you think the future for Titan holds? Looking past this acquisition, the next 12-18 months.

DM: If these processes work, as I believe they do, the future's outstanding. It's an outstanding speculative play. Again, you have to say that they're unseasoned stocks. But nevertheless, what they have on a fundamental basis, and as we all know there are other factors in the market; but on a fundamental basis, you practically can't miss if these processes for recovery work. And don't forget, they're not through acquiring either. They could announce other acquisitions, of acreage, of companies at any time in the future. So this is a long way from the end of the story.

S-L: So essentially there are several catalysts in place which could really get the stock moving.

DM: Well, that's pretty obvious. But to me, I like to feel secure. To me the major catalyst is the announcement of production. When production results come in, the market will know that they've made the first step towards proving to the public that these recovery processes work.

S-L: This production that you're talking about, when is the earliest that we can expect something like this to happen?

DM: Very shortly. I would say within the next month to three months. It'll be up to the market to say how many months they want to see before they start paying up for this. But I think that'll be an ongoing process; where you'll see the prices move up. I was going to say "gradually," but I don't know how gradual it'll be.

S-L: Thanks for your insight!

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION
Washington, D.C.

LITIGATION RELEASE NO. 15950 /October 27, 1998

SECURITIES AND EXCHANGE COMMISSION v. STARWOOD MEDIA GROUP,
INC., and JACK MARKS a/k/a JACOB MESTECHKIN, 98 Civ. 7659
(RO) (S.D.N.Y.)

The Commission sued a New York public-relations firm
and its owner for disseminating information about stocks on
their website, Stock-Line.com, without fully and accurately
disclosing that the featured companies had paid for the
touts. Jack Marks, formerly named Jacob Mestechkin, heads
Starwood Media Group, a small firm in lower Manhattan.
Starwood also publishes a monthly print version of the
internet site, Wall Street Reporter, which is distributed
free of charge. The Commission's complaint alleges that
Starwood's publications do not accurately describes the
compensation arrangements with featured companies, as
follows. At least three of the featured companies have paid
consideration to Starwood Media, in cash, stock, or options,
exceeding $10,000 in value. The three companies are a
start-up motorcycle manufacturer, American Quantum Cycles,
Inc.; a golf-course developer, Golf Ventures, Inc.; and a
technology personnel firm, Infocall Communications Corp.
The stocks of all three companies trade on the Over-the-
Counter bulletin board.

Stock-Line's disclosure, buried in a mislabeled
linkage, understates the amount of compensation received for
the touts, and fails to disclose Starwood's receipt of
potentially valuable options. The disclosure in the Wall
Street Reporter is also misleading in stating the featured
companies either "have purchased or may purchase" investor
relations services, when all companies have paid to appear
in the journal. According to the Commission's complaint,
Marks was on notice of the disclosure requirements, and
persisted in his unlawful conduct even after consulting an
attorney on the legal basis for a competitor's disclosure of
specific amounts of stocks and options from featured
companies. The Commission is seeking permanent injunctive
relief and penalties based on the alleged violations of
Section 17(b) of the Securities Act.

Without admitting or denying the allegations in the
Complaint, defendants Marks and Starwood have consented to
the entry of an order permanently enjoining them from
violations of Section 17(b) and requiring them to pay a
civil penalty of $15,000.

Recent Interviews:
Ground Floor/The Hirsch Organization, Yale Hirsch
Kon-Lin Letter, Konrad Kuhn
The Cheap Investor, Bill Mathews
The Bowser Report, Max Bowser
Redstone Securities, Phil Piper
Gaming Industry Report, Alan Woinski
S.A. Advisory, Bill Velmer
©1997Starwood Media Group, Inc.



To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (161)12/12/2002 4:19:15 PM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 544
 
LARRY PRESSLER ON SKY CAPITAL HOLDINGS ADVISORY BOARD. HE WAS ALSO ON TURBODYNES. THE BEST PART IS A RAY DIRKS ANALYST HAD RECOMMENDED "American Technologies Group, Inc. (OTC BB Symbol: ATEG)." Lawrence Pressler WAS/IS A director of American Technologies Group

skycapitalholdings.com




Larry Pressler is chairman of Pressler & Associates, a government relations /consulting firm in Washington DC and Sioux Falls South Dakota, specializing in telecommunications and transportation. Since April 1998 he has also been a partner in the Washington DC law firm of O'Connor & Hannan LLP. He is chair of O'Connor & Hannan's Telecommunications and Business Group. He was a member of the U.S. Senate (R-SD) from 1979-1997 and a member of the U.S. House (R-SD) from 1974-1979. Senator Pressler authored the Telecommunications Act of 1996. He served as a senior fellow at the University of California at Los Angeles during 2000. Sen. Pressler was a visiting practitioner /professor at the University of South Dakota during the fall semester of 2000 and a visiting professor at the Lower Brule Community College during the spring 1999 and 2001 semesters. He currently serves as an adjunct faculty member at Oglala Lakota College. During 1999, Sen. Pressler lectured at Harvard Law School and Georgetown Business School. He is a member of the board of directors of Infosys Technologies Ltd., a company engaged in the computer software business, Global Light Telecommunications, a Canadian telecommunications company and CustomerLinx, which operates call centers.
===========================================

December 20, 1999
Turbodyne’s auditors resign.On December 9, 1999, Turbodyne Technologies, Inc. (Trading Symbol: TRBD) (Price: $5.3437) announced the Board of Directors had retained a new Disclosure Committee. The Committee consisted of three members: Senator Lawrence L. Pressler, Charles R. McCarthy, Jr. and John M. Fedders. The terms of their retainer were not disclosed. Apparently, these men were not on the Board of Directors and have not been appointed to the Board. They are described as "independent experts." Charles McCarthy and Lawrence Pressler are directors of American Technologies Group, Inc. (OTC BB Symbol: ATEG). They have been ATEG directors since 1998 and 1999, respectively. American Technologies has claimed to have numerous business activities and products including high energy particle beam technology, an alternative to conventional laundry detergents, gold mining interests, fuel additives and water purification technology. American Technologies’ stock has traded at $16.75 and is currently trading at $0.30 per share. Charles McCarthy and Lawrence Pressler are also both partners in the law firm of O’Connor & Hannan.John Fedders has represented Charles O. Huttoe, the former chairman and chief executive officer of Systems of Excellence, Inc. Systems of Excellence was the SEC’s first case of Internet stock-touting fraud. At least five individuals have pled guilty to felony charges stemming from manipulation. In 1996, Mr. Huttoe pleaded guilty to criminal charges of violating securities laws and engaging in money laundering.In the "Disclosure Committee" press release, Turbodyne announced that KPMG had resigned from its "client-auditor" relationship. Turbodyne stated they were pursuing the retention of another independent public accountant.Turbodyne included its "patented pollution-reduction" claims at the end of the press release. We found the inclusion of Turbodyne’s promotional self-description statement and the treatment of the resignation of its auditors as a secondary issue in a press release announcing a "New Disclosure Committee" that is supposed to approve releases to be very amusing.Asensio & Company, Inc. is a New York-based institutional investment bank specializing in corporate valuations and equity research. Asensio & Company also specializes in investigating stock promotions and publishing research on companies it identifies as grossly overvalued, as defined. A complete documented history of Asensio’s published work with grossly overvalued securities, and the firm’s definition of gross overvaluation, is available on the Internet at www.asensio.com. Asensio & Company is actively engaged in short selling and advises its clients on securities it believes are overvalued. Asensio & Company has issued reports on Turbodyne and has sold short Turbodyne shares. Short selling is an investment plan that allows an investor to profit from a decline in stock prices. These reports are also available on Asensio & Company's Internet home page, located at www.asensio.com.Short selling involves a risk not associated with the purchase of stock including, but not only limited to, unlimited loss and stock borrowing risks. Additional information is available upon request.

Back to Turbodyne Index | Back to Main Menu

To:TheTruthseeker who started this subject
From: tonybaretta Sunday, Jun 23, 2002 2:54 PM
View Replies (1) | Respond to of 219

In the course of conducting our background research about ATEG, we perused the Silicon Investor web site (www.techstocks.com)) Security Capital Trading, Inc.
Stevens R. Monte, CFA
520 Madison Avenue, 10th Floor Phone: (212) 339-2000
New York, New York 10022-4213 (888) 305-0050
Member NASD - Member SIPC Fax: (212) 339-2020http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~dst/ATG/A12.htmlPerhaps the most interesting part is the mention of Mr. Touretzky is a Senior Research Computer Scientist in the Computer Science Department at the Carnegie Mellon School of Computer Sciences in Pittsburgh, PA. His hatred for ATEG goes so far that he has established his own very large web site www-2.cs.cmu.edu on which he has alleged that officers of the company are associated with a cult, the Church of Scientology, and that ATEG's technology is a fraud. We would suggest that potential investors access that web site for further details.http://finance.yahoo.com/q?s=ATEG.OB



To: Kevin Podsiadlik who wrote (161)12/13/2002 11:00:44 AM
From: StockDung  Respond to of 544
 
.New Tel: from cash to ash
By Geoff Elliott
December 14, 2002

ON Wednesday, in offices just off the Pacific Highway in North Sydney, one of the final acts in Australia's extraordinary dotcom boom was being played out.

Peter Malone, the chief of New Tel, was being told he wasn't welcome in New Tel's offices any more.

The administrators were in. "By the book" men in suits – the antithesis of what the laissez faire, easy-money days of the dotcom boom was all about – had locked down the building, and were asking Malone to hand over his laptop and keys.

PricewaterhouseCoopers had been appointed the night before – called in by Optus, which was owed more than $10 million – after a month-long attempt at a rescue collapsed.

Malone tried to get into his office, but found his security card didn't work. The dozen or so people left at New Tel – more than 200 had been sacked in the past few weeks – shifted uncomfortably at the scene they had to witness, defining the end of what had been an incredible ride. Malone is the last of the new economy gurus. Like the others, he's shared a parabolic rise and fall.

His stocks soared in 1999 as he convinced investors to part with more than $100 million.

The turning point – in common with his new economy counterparts – came during the April 2000 dotcom crash. Malone's been headed for a crash landing ever since.

While this is clearly yet-another tale of the falsity of the telco and internet boom – a speculative frenzy that made paper billionaires of stock promoters for a short time – Malone isn't seeing it.

Like One.Tel's Jodee Rich, Solution 6's Chris Tyler and Spike Network's Chris O'Hanlon, Malone's vision of being at the vanguard of a new way in business brought him unstuck. For a short time, investors rewarded executives like Malone – and it seems he has trouble letting go.

According to those around him, he still doesn't see what the fuss is all about. This month's battles, he says, are a hiccup.

"Peter is a fairy-tale believer," says Peter Jermyn, a Perth-based businessman who's known Malone since the 1980s, and who has lost several million dollars on New Tel.

"He reads Cinderella at night, and is convinced he'll wake up with a glass slipper on his foot. I don't think he's devious or crooked, but he just totally believes in himself."

It's a theme reminiscent of Jodee Rich, who still refuses to accept responsibility for the collapse of One.Tel despite the overwhelming evidence the company was simply managed appallingly. New Tel and One.Tel have a lot in common.

"Malone is an extraordinary character," Jermyn says.

"But his biggest weakness ishe can't divorce fantasy from reality.

"I spoke to him this week," Jermyn said, "and he says everything's going to be OK, asking what's everyone panicking for."

There's plenty to worry about. There are obvious questions about where more than $100 million in shareholders' funds and another $100 million or more in cash flow went. And The Australian, which has tracked New Tel's demise, has now learned of dubious trading in New Tel stock on the US Nasdaq exchange.

Malone's right-hand man in the US, Peter Germinario – who helped get New Tel listed on the technology-focused Nasdaq – is at the centre of questionable share trading ahead of an announcement that sent New Tel's share price rocketing in January 2000.

Germinario was on the New Tel payroll, and one of Malone's closest associates. Just days before the New Tel marketing machine revved up its ambitious plans for China's internet market, Germinario exercised 500,000 options at 63c each.

The options weren't due to expire for three years. But he locked in the stock and, according to sources, started selling just days later when New Tel's shares soared more than 300 per cent.

The 63c shares rocketed to more than $3.50 when, on January 4, a speech by New Tel chairman Harry Sorensen – a Perth corporate establishment figure – was released to the market.

More was also revealed about New Tel's alliance with a company purported to be linked to the official Chinese news agency Xinhua, and how New Tel was in a "unique position to access a market that is forecast to be worth over $US12 billion (about $21 billion) by2002".

New Tel had released some information about an alliance in November, but this latest news lit thefuse on the stock.

Malone had just completed a series of whirlwind tours to China and the US. It's not clear if he met RayDirks, New Tel's favourite broker in theUS.

But Dirks was well briefed on the China deal, had issued a series of favourable "buy" reports on NewTel, and struck gold for New Tel's shareholders when he appeared on CNN on January 3, 2000, trumpeting New Tel as the "AOL of Asia" – a reference to the giant US media and internet company.

Day traders were alerted, and the stock went berserk. As soon as itdid, Germinario started selling – as did New Tel director Mark Hake, an Arizona-based fund manager. He told the Australian Stock Exchange he ceased to be a substantial shareholder in February 2000, a month after the company's extraordinary share price run.

Dirks, who in the early 1980s successfully defended an insidertrading charge brought by the Securities Exchange Commission, was just one of New Tel's spruikers in the US.

Others included Vivian Lewis,who's also based in Arizona and has close links with Hake. She openly touted the stock to her subscribers on the back of information she toldinvestors had been supplied by Hake.

This in an email to her newsletter subscribers in early 2000: "Mark Hake's managed accounts and this newsletter have owned (New Tel) ever since Mark wrote up the stock for us. In addition to her personal stake in New Tel, Vivian also owns more via a limited partnership run by Mark."

She recommended New Tel as a "strong buy", and told investors not to worry about disinformation being spread about New Tel and its China deal.

Indeed, almost as soon as New Tel's supposedly ground-breaking deal in China was announced, doubts about the transaction with Xinhua Holdings emerged. Xinhua News Agency – the mouthpiece for China's leaders – denied any links with New Tel.

Malone planned to raise $200 million on the back of the deal. But investors soon grew wary, and the placement never took place.

Xinhua Holdings was simply a shell company that boasted directors with connections to the Xinhua agency, but little else.

Nonetheless, one of the men from Xinhua Holdings, An Zhou, has remained on New Tel's board. New Tel paid at least $4.1 million to Xinhua Holdings, and issued tens of millions of shares.

Nothing has come of it.

Where has the money gone?

Apart from a river of funds flowing to Hong Kong, there's been the first-class travel. Expenses at Malone's small office in Perth have been running at $800,000 a month. And his 79-year-old father, Francis, was on the payroll for $30,000 in an unexplained role.

Salary and bonuses to Malone afforded him a $400,000 Aston Martin, on which he spent another $200,000 having it stretched 15 cm.

Of course, none of this adds up to the huge sums New Tel managed to raise.

A lot went in transactions to related parties of the directors.

Director Domenic Martino, a friend of Malone's for the past 20 years, earned enormous fees for his accounting firm Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu. Martino is chief executive of Deloitte in Australia, and helped collect more than $4 million in 2000 and 2001 for the company. Another $400,000 is still owing. Martino resigned from New Tel in February.

Deloitte helped work on the China project, and boasted it was instrumental in "developing the strategy, business plan, and implementation plan for New Tel in China".

How Deloitte helped get the deal so spectacularly wrong has never been explained.

Then there are the dealings with Mark Hake. Annual accounts indicate New Tel lent $467,727 to US company Fitness Age – of which Hake was a director. The 2001 financial reports indicate New Tel wrote off this loan, raising a provision in the accounts for the entire amount.

Core New Tel activities, like telecommunications, weren't Malone's strong point.

Investments in other entities include an unlisted US company called Your Health, in which New Tel sank $4.9 million.

After failing to commercialise any products, the company transferred its "intellectual property" to Radiant Nutritionals, and New Tel landed a 45 per cent stake.

Malone became chairman of the New York-based group.

The last word is that the company is "continuing to develop, amongst other things, non-invasive and natural pharmaceutical alternatives to traditional Western medicine".

Another New Tel director in 2001 was lawyer Paul Evans. He's a partner in Freehills, which earned $1.17 million in fees in 2001, on top of $740,000 in 2000.

Evans resigned from New Tel in August 2001.

The flow of funds out of New Tel has left shareholders angry, and lawsuits relating to the collapse of the company are being prepared.

Australia's corporate watchdog, the Australian Securities and Investments Commission, is investigating New Tel (and has interviewed Malone) over its suspicion that the company may have traded while insolvent.

The Weekend Australian has learnt that ASIC is paying close attention to the extraordinary share trading in New Tel shares.

But for all that, Malone remains seemingly unperturbed.

Indeed, even as the administrators from PWC copied hard drives and documents and examined New Tel's anaemic cash-flow statements this week, Malone was at Sydney's five-star Westin hotel hosting a dinner for about a dozen people, including Robin Armstrong from Findlay Stockbrokers, who helped raise millions for New Tel.

Also there were Melbourne-based corporate crook Richard Steggall and his father, Neil – their criminal reputation exposed in the past month as they attempted to come up with a rescue plan for New Tel.

And Joe Tuomo was there, too. Tuomo is a partner with wealthy Melbourne businessman Mario Salvo in rental car business Delta.

Tuomo wouldn't speak to The Weekend Australian, but from all reports he wasn't there to wish Malone well.

Tuomo and Salvo, worth more than $100 million, want answers from Malone.

New Tel acquired Delta's telephony offshoot early this year, issuing a $4 million convertible note.

Tuomo and Salvo are now standing in the queue with the other creditors.

But in the money-go-round that has characterised the junior end of the telecommunications sector, Tuomo and Salvo say they kicked in $1.6 million as part of Malone's attempts to buy another telephone company, Digiplus.

Then the wheels fell off. The acquisition collapsed as Malone started to realise that the days of easy finance were finished for telcos.

It's another sorry tale for New Tel shareholders, and testament to the kind of deals Malone did.

First, he paid Digiplus a non-refundable $1 million deposit, so that's gone.

Then he paid a further $4 million – and now Digiplus chief Mike Robinson says he does not have to give it back.

Tuomo and Salvo have begun legal action in the NSW Supreme Court to recover what they say is their $1.6 million share.

"Our deal was with New Tel," Robinson says. "It doesn't matter to us where Peter Malone got his money from."

If he's right, Malone will add the debt he owes Tuomo and Salvo to what's becoming a long list.