Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: KLP who wrote (38757)	8/19/2002 10:34:28 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 281500

Actually, your comment prompted my question....After all, we WERE attacked on Sept 11, 2001. Oh, definitely, and there is no doubt what the source of the attack was, Al Qaeda. A great deal of the debate here is whether there was evidence of links between Saddam and Al Qaeda in the planning and/or execution of that attack. None has appeared to date. So, conclusion, while we were attacked, best evidence is that Saddam did not attack us. And it's likely that attacking Saddam only makes the pursuit of Al Qaeda a great deal more difficult.