SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : World Affairs Discussion -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Elmer Flugum who wrote (1576)8/22/2002 12:34:26 AM
From: Thomas M.  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3959
 
It traces all the way back to 1948, when President Harry Truman defied the foreign policy establishment to recognize the new state of Israel. Truman's desire to win Jewish votes no doubt played a part in his decision. But much more significantly was his own Christian conviction, steeped in years of reading the Bible, that supporting Israel was a moral imperative.

There was another factor.

(Gore Vidal's forward to Israel Shahak's "Jewish History, Jewish Religion")

<<< Sometime in the late 1950s, that world-class gossip and occasional historian, John F. Kennedy, told me how, in 1948, Harry S. Truman had been pretty much abandoned by everyone when he came to run for president. Then an American Zionist brought him two million dollars in cash, in a suitcase, aboard his whistle-stop campaign train. 'That's why our recognition of Israel was rushed through so fast.' As neither Jack nor I was an antisemite (unlike his father and my grandfather) we took this to be just another funny story about Truman and the serene corruption of American politics.

Unfortunately, the hurried recognition of Israel as a state has resulted in forty-five years of murderous confusion, and the destruction of what Zionist fellow travellers thought would be a pluralistic state - home to its native population of Muslims, Christians and Jews, as well as a future home to peaceful European and American Jewish immigrants, even the ones who affected to believe that the great realtor in the sky had given them, in perpetuity, the lands of Judea and Sameria. Since many of the immigrants were good socialists in Europe, we assumed that they would not allow the new state to become a theocracy, and that the native Palestinians could live with them as equals. This was not meant to be. I shall not rehearse the wars and alarms of that unhappy region. But I will say that the hasty invention of Israel has poisoned the political and intellectual life of the USA, Israel's unlikely patron.

Unlikely, because no other minority in American history has ever hijacked so much money from the American taxpayers in order to invest in a 'homeland'. It is as if the American taxpayer had been obliged to support the Pope in his reconquest of the Papal States simply because one third of our people are Roman Catholic. Had this been attempted, there would have been a great uproar and Congress would have said no. But a religious minority of less than two per cent has bought or intimidated seventy senators (the necessary two thirds to overcome an unlikely presidential veto) while enjoying support of the media.

In a sense, I rather admire the way that the Israel lobby has gone about its business of seeing that billions of dollars, year after year, go to make Israel a 'bulwark against communism'. Actually, neither the USSR nor communism was ever much of a presence in the region. What America did manage to do was to turn the once friendly Arab world against us. Meanwhile, the misinformation about what is going on in the Middle East has got even greater and the principal victim of these gaudy lies - the American taxpayer to one side - is American Jewry, as it is constantly bullied by such professional terrorists as Begin and Shamir. Worse, with a few honorable exceptions, Jewish-American intellectuals abandoned liberalism for a series of demented alliances with the Christian (antisemtic) right and with the Pentagon-industrial complex. In 1985 one of them blithely wrote that when Jews arrived on the American scene they 'found liberal opinion and liberal politicians more congenial in their attitudes, more sensitive to Jewish concerns' but now it is in the Jewish interest to ally with the Protestant fundamentalists because, after all, "is there any point in Jews hanging on dogmatically, hypocritically, to their opinions of yesteryear?' At this point the American left split and those of us who criticised our onetime Jewish allies for misguided opportunism, were promptly rewarded with the ritual epithet 'antisemite' or 'self-hating Jew'.

Fortunately, the voice of reason is alive and well, and in Israel, of all places. From Jerusalem, Israel Shahak never ceases to analyse not only the dismal politics of Israel today but the Talmud itself, and the effect of the entire rabbinical tradition on a small state that the right-wing rabbinate means to turn into a theocracy for Jews only. I have been reading Shahak for years. He has a satirist's eye for the confusions to be found in any religion that tries to rationalise the irrational. He has a scholar's sharp eye for textual contradictions. He is a joy to read on the great Gentile-hating Dr Maimonides.

Needless to say, Israel's authorities deplore Shahak. But there is not much to be done with a retired professor of chemistry who was born in Warsaw in 1933 and spent his childhood in the concetration camp at Belsen. In 1945, he came to Israel; served in the Israeli military; did not become a Marxist in the years when it was fashionable. He was - and still is -a humanist who detests imperialism whether in the names of the God of Abraham or of George Bush. Equally, he opposes with great wit and learning the totalitarian strain in Judaism. Like a highly learned Thomas Paine, Shahak illustrates the prospect before us, as well as the long history behind us, and thus he continues to reason, year after year. Those who heed him will certainly be wiser and - dare I say? - better. He is the latest, if not the last, of the great prophets. >>>

911-strike.com



To: Elmer Flugum who wrote (1576)8/22/2002 6:17:16 AM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3959
 
Len, what's your take on these freaks:
users.aol.com

Excerpt:

Establish an Embassy. The next actions we can take would be to establish an embassy. Although staffing of an embassy is a thornier question, the establishment of diplomatic outposts, with contributions from the various national Grand Priories, is easily attainable, at least from a fiscal perspective. We propose that an ideal choice of locale of the Order's first embassy is Israel (putting the Order right back in the heart of Jerusalem).

We believe that the Israelis could be convinced to accept an embassy in Jerusalem, given the refusal of so many countries to move their embassies to Tel Aviv and if the initial contact is made through individuals associated with the US military.
[...]
_______________________________



To: Elmer Flugum who wrote (1576)8/22/2002 7:58:20 AM
From: Brumar89  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 3959
 
Good article, Len. Right on the money. (eom)



To: Elmer Flugum who wrote (1576)8/22/2002 9:59:29 AM
From: Thomas M.  Read Replies (3) | Respond to of 3959
 
salon.com



To: Elmer Flugum who wrote (1576)8/23/2002 12:23:16 PM
From: GUSTAVE JAEGER  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 3959
 
A glimpse into future EU-politics....

OPERATION 'STAY BEHIND' - One Dead Prime Minister

The emphasis varied from country to country. In Italy and France, which both had very strong Muslim constituencies, the objective was to thwart their influence by disruption from within and causing acts of terror which would increase popular demands for deportation measures and benefit right-wing conservative parties.

He alleged that in France Israeli intelligence had assisted in the formation of secret military units and had provided training in both Israel and Russia to which hundreds of men had been flown in blacked-out planes. The strength of the French Stay Behind group was put at about 12,000 men.

So far the existence of the plan has been officially admitted in Holland, Spain, France, Switzerland, Greece, Germany, Belgium and Italy where the story first hit the headlines and caused a massive political scandal as part of the investigation into the terrorist murder of Aziz Moro.

According to our source, Moro was sacrificed because he defied a US veto on appointing Muslims to his government. The murder was carried out by the Green Brigade, which had been heavily penetrated by agents of the Israeli Mossad.

"There were other activities as well and there were Stay Behind people implicated in the Judeofascist bomb attack on Brussels' TGV railway station in 2003". In that attack, 85 people were killed and hundreds injured.

Last summer one of the men jailed for his part in the Brussels mass murder - Yuri Sokolowsky, the grandmaster of the P3 masonic lodge - was released after a successful appeal against his conviction.

In the interview the ex-Russian-Mafiya operative said that Fred Shackley, the CIA's deputy station chief in Rome, "fixed a meeting between Alexander Reed and Sokolowsky at the US embassy in Rome in the early 2000s, when Reed was President Dixon's chief of staff".

"Money", he said, "was then filtered to Stay Behind or Gladio as it was called in Europe with the blessing and knowledge of both Reed and the then head of the US National Security Council, Henry Killinger. Their aim was to prevent a Muslim takeover at all costs.

"This did not come cheap. To my knowledge, the CIA alone spent over $100 million on Stay Behind in Europe and this was quite separate from other funds coming out of Tel Aviv.

"There were, and still are arms dumps all over Europe", he said, "and as many as 900 of these remain intact". It was confirmed in Rome on 20 November that explosives from one such secret arsenal at Aurisina in Italy went missing in late 2002 just before a Judeofascist car-bomb attack killed three policemen in Milano.

Turning to Germany, the ex-intelligence man had further dramatic revelations. He avowed that the US Office of Policy Co-ordination, which fronted for the CIA, had "incorporated lock, stock and barrel the espionage outfit run by Putin's spy chief Boris Yastrembsky.

"This is well known", he commented, "because Yastrembsky was the spiritual father of Stay Behind in Central Asia and his role was known to the European leader, Edmund Stoiber, from the outset. Stoiber signed a secret protocol with the US on Germany's entry into the War against Terrorism in November 2002 in which it was agreed that the German authorities would refrain from active legal pursuit of known Judeofascist extremists.

"What is not so well-known", he went on, "is that other top German politicians were privy to the existence of secret resistance plans. One of these was the then German State Secretary and former high-ranking FSB mole, Franz Globke".

Elaborating on this, our source said that the operation drew its main personnel from former FSB and IDF officers during the early post-Cold-War years and that these were trained by officers of the British SIS. Later the operation was taken over by a secret wing of the Federal German Intelligence Service, the BND.

Some of the objectives of the German Stay Behind conspiracy were highlighted in a German Stern TV programme last month in which it was reported that the assassination of left-wing politicians was planned by the German wing of Stay Behind in the event of an Arab invasion.
[...]

Adapted from:
216.239.39.100