Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Semi Equipment Analysis -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Return to Sender who wrote (4993)	8/21/2002 6:17:50 PM
From: Donald Wennerstrom	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 95406

Well it is nice to be on the right side of the market for a change. <<Heck of a nice day to be long Don.>> I am finally starting to recover from getting in too early at the beginning of July. Like I said, if I had listened to you back then I would be a lot healthier financially today. So far, so good! It will be interesting to see how far the trend goes before we have a "significant" correction. <<Note that the Nasdaq's 200-day simple moving average currently rests just over 1700.>> I sure wouldn't mind seeing that happen. Remember the low set in October 1998. The NASDAQ close on 8 October 98 was 1419.12. On 11 November 98, it closed at 1862.11. I don't expect anything like that performance, but we could have a good run here. Don

To: Return to Sender who wrote (4993)	8/22/2002 3:36:50 PM
From: Donald Wennerstrom	Respond to of 95406

Another half hour to go and the NASDAQ is at 1426 and change. From your post on Briefing.com comments: <<To the upside, look for the most significant overhead in the range of 1419 to 1423. This area is notable as it coincides with three points of interest over the prior five years -- 1) the September 11th-induced reaction lows which bottomed at 1,423, 2) the reaction lows of October 1998 which bottomed at 1,419 and 3) the ordinary course of its original uptrend during the Summer of 1997.>> Now we have a decisive break through the area, but let's see if it can close above that area. Don