Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : Slavery Reparations -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (60)	8/21/2002 8:24:52 PM
From: Joseph Waligore	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 203

I never said I believed in reparations for slavery. I said it was a much more serious issue than Farrakhan alone and it may be similar to dealing with injustices to Indians and Japanese-Americans. I think serious, intelligent, well-meaning people can believe in slavery reparations; I would not put Farrakhan in that class.

To: Lazarus_Long who wrote (60)	8/24/2002 5:02:15 AM
From: average joe	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 203

Shall Catholics be held responsible for the atrocities of the Inquisition? Here is a primer on trans-generational guilt. Why hold Catholics to a standard lower than they demand? "The Inquisition decided that Jewish ancestry determined secret Jews. If one had a Jewish grandparent, this person had Jewish blood and was therefor a Converso. Although all Conversos had been baptized, washing sin from their souls, it was determined that Jewish blood was so filthy it was impervious to baptism and divine grace (which is in itself a heresy). The Pure Blood Laws were introduced." shanmonster.lilsproutz.com newadvent.org