Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (289127)	8/21/2002 11:42:14 PM
From: CYBERKEN	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Then you will just have to be consoled with being plainly incorrect. You've certainly had enough practice. They didn't get it done, Steve. They collared half the black voters, turned them around, and sent them right back in to vote another time, AND THEY STILL DIDN'T HAVE THE VOTES. The USSC saw it. The rest of the nation watched it in horror and disbelief on CNN, while the blank-eyed info babes cheered for the criminal Dems and insulted every Republican official to his/her face, practically spitting on them. But the Florida result couldn't possibly have been clearer: Bush won...

To: Steve Dietrich who wrote (289127)	8/21/2002 11:45:45 PM
From: DavesM	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Steve, Have you ever voted using a butterfly ballot? I have. They are not at all difficult to figure out. I do not know who people "meant" to vote for, but I can tell you that Ralph Nader got 100,000 votes in Florida. How many of those voters, feel pretty stupid now? I bet, not very many would even admit to doing it (voting for Nader). Better to tell people you were confused by the ballot, and voted for Pat Buchanan by mistake ;o) lol In New Hampshire, Nader got 20,000 votes (Gore lost the state by about 10,000-15,000).