SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Biotech / Medical : Biotech Valuation -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: RCMac who wrote (6958)8/23/2002 8:03:44 AM
From: Hank  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 52153
 
Iressa troubles spell woes for drug class - update

--------------------------------------------------------------------------------

Scrip, August 22, 2002
The surprise failure of AstraZeneca's anticancer, Iressa (gefitinib; ZD1839),
to show any survival benefit in the combination INTACT studies of non-small-cell
lung cancer (NSCLC) has led analysts to slash their earnings forecasts for the
product and cast doubt over the potential of this entire new class of
anticancers.
The results of the trial (see adjacent story) may mean the end for Iressa in
NSCLC combination therapy - for which filings were due in the fourth quarter -
but the company says it is still pressing ahead with monotherapy approvals.
Iressa has already been approved in Japan as monotherapy in recurrent NSCLC and
a 2002 launch in the US for this indication is planned, pending an FDA advisory
panel review on September 24th.
...novel drug class
Iressa is the most advanced of the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR)
tyrosine kinase inhibitors in development for cancer. Others include ImClone
Systems' Erbitux (cetuximab; licensed to Bristol-Myers Squibb and Merck KGaA)
and OSI Pharmaceuticals' Tarceva (erlotinib; licensed to Genentech and Roche),
both of which are in Phase III trials, as well as a number of other products
further back in development (see table).
Following the success of Novartis' targeted anticancer, the tyrosine kinase
product Glivec (imatinib), there has been a lot of interest in the EGF receptor
tyrosine kinases at cancer meetings over the past year or so because of their
promise as a targeted therapy with fewer side-effects than conventional
treatments.
Iressa and similar agents work within the cell to target and block EGFR
signalling, which is responsible for the growth and survival of cancer cells in
NSCLC and other tumour types including colorectal, head and neck, prostate and
breast cancers. The targeted mode of action means that side-effects are
generally mild. Those of Iressa include diarrhoea and skin rash.
Some experts are concerned that the INTACT data will deter doctors from
conducting future combination trials with EGFR products.
Dr Richard Sullivan, head of clinical programmes at the CRC in London, UK, says
that the INTACT data are disappointing. But he believes there is still an
important place for the EGFR tyrosine kinases in cancer therapy. "The bottom
line is the news is not doom for all of these products. Tyrosinases are hugely
important drivers of cancer and so are important targets for anticancer
therapy," he said. The failure of INTACT does not spell failure for other EGFR
tyrosine kinase inhibitors in combination with chemotherapy, since even subtle
differences between the products can result in profound differences in the
clinic, Dr Sullivan noted. There are still problems that need to be overcome
with tyrosine kinase inhibitors, and we are still in the early stages of
knowing how best to use them, he added.
...regulatory hurdles
Despite their potential, regulatory agencies are generally more cautious about
approving products in a novel drug class and some experts believe AstraZeneca
may next face difficulty in gaining US approval for the monotherapy indication,
because the IDEAL data may not be strong enough (Scrip No 2762, p 18).
Indeed, Iressa is not alone in facing regulatory problems with its EGFR
product. Delays for ImClone's Erbitux began last December, when an FDA panel
rejected the BLA because it wanted more data. Since then, Erbitux has been
delayed further and US approval is still some way off (Scrip No 2748, p 20).
EGFR products in development
Product Brand name Originator Phase
gefitinib Iressa AstraZeneca III
cetuximab Erbitux ImClone III
erlotinib Tarceva OSI Pharma III
EMD-72000 Merck KGaA II
TP-38 Ivax II
PKI-166 Novartis II
Source = Pharmaprojects.
Analysts at Morgan Stanley have reduced their global EGFR model to $3 billion
in total sales in 2008 "to reflect diminished class potential". But although the
INTACT failure was a shock, they say it is too soon to write off the whole EGFR
inhibitor drug class. They believe the poor results could be due to patient
selection or the high hurdle of improving on combination therapy in first-line
use.
Keen to distance itself from the news of AstraZeneca's failed trial, OSI has
issued a statement saying that it remains on track with three Phase III NSCLC
trials with Tarceva. Although both Iressa and Tarceva work by blocking the EGFR
pathway, there are important differences between the agents and clinical
programmes including structure, formulation, pharmacokinetics and Phase III
design and dosing, OSI maintains. Its share price plunged by 57.1% to $14.05 on
the failed INTACT trial, while ImClone Systems' fell by 10.6% to $8.26 on the
news on August 19th.
OSI says one trial with Tarceva monotherapy in refractory NSCLC patients and
two in combination with chemotherapy are continuing and have "noteworthy
differences" from the INTACT study. Tarceva is given at 150mg/day and the
trials are powered for a 25% improvement in survival. SCRIP - World
Pharmaceutical News FILED 22 August 2002 COPYRIGHT 2002 PJB Publications Ltd
gene.com
ms.com
Copyright (c) 2002 PJB Publications, Ltd.
Received by NewsEDGE/LAN: 08/23/2002 5:18 AM