Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (39376)	8/26/2002 9:17:25 PM
From: Dayuhan	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Ancient history, I know, but I'm just back form a trip.... The question is, which scenario makes it more or less likely that a stray nuke will go off in Manhattan, this one or doing nothing? I would say that the more involvement and presence we have in the middle east - particularly involvements like extended occupations - the more likely it is that we will be targeted. I think it exceedingly unlikely that Saddan would, even if he had a nuke, send it to Manhattan. He doesn't strike me as the suicidal sort; only to happy to send others off to be martyred, none to eager to do it himself.