SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Lane3 who wrote (19605)8/22/2002 9:50:44 AM
From: Original Mad Dog  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 21057
 
I understand where you are coming from, though I don't recall your post on the subject. The irony may be that you did not do anything wrong and answered the questions truthfully (even though they probably weren't under oath), he did do something wrong and lied when asked the questions while under oath. And of course, there is that small little distinction that he is the official in charge of faithfully executing the country's laws, based on an oath he took in front of the whole nation, while you and I are mere worker bees. Just maybe that oath means that he should have had a bit more respect for the importance of telling the truth in our legal system when under oath.



To: Lane3 who wrote (19605)8/22/2002 10:14:04 AM
From: jlallen  Respond to of 21057
 
However, his prosecutors showed no more respect for the system and principles than he.

Care to elaborate? I don't agree. This is just more shooting the messenger...