Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Research Frontiers (REFR) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Bob Trocchi who wrote (3008)	8/22/2002 12:09:40 PM
From: N. Dixon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 50065

whatever "feels good" at the time. Bridge Player and Bob, What feels "good" is that this the best rebuttal you can come up with. In other words you have no rebuttal. NREL thought enough of SPD technology to invite Joe Harary to present at their biennial conference on electrochromism. That speaks volumes since NREL has been financing a competitive technology. Why after all these years have they invited REFR to present? Guess. ND

To: Bob Trocchi who wrote (3008)	8/22/2002 3:19:48 PM
From: Kevin Podsiadlik	Respond to of 50065

The story said it could* save 50% in energy.* Well, for that matter, it could save 100% in energy, if it's so ugly it drives everyone out of the house so there's no need for climate control. Also was the plane's cabin temp really 25 degrees C cooler. If it were C degrees that translates to 77 degrees F. Now it's 25 degrees C? Last month it was 25 degrees F (and only a 40% energy savings IIRC). BTW, a 25 degree difference in C temperature only corresponds to a 45 degree difference on the F scale. But it still begs the question of just what temperature that cabin would normally be at for SPD to make such a huge difference. A question Nancy was very adamant in not answering when I brought it up, I might add.