Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (289295)	8/22/2002 12:06:13 PM
From: Neocon	Respond to of 769670

I understand the misunderstanding, I am clearing it up.

To: jlallen who wrote (289295)	8/22/2002 12:07:38 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 769670

By the way, I have shown a lot of cojones in the past couple of months, you just don't like it because I have stood up for what I thought right despite getting a lot of guff from people who were supposed to be my friends......

To: jlallen who wrote (289295)	8/22/2002 12:21:38 PM
From: Neocon	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 769670

As much as I enjoy being called a wimp and a liar, idiotic and stupid (Watson), a waste of time (CK), and so forth, I think I will take this lull to take a break from SI. Maybe I will return later in the day. Meanwhile, I will make a parting remark: Bill's mistake about my posts is too typical of the reasoning that leads to some of the most egregious attacks on SI. jla posted before I responded to Bill's posts, thus I must be lying :except that I was researching, came back, and went through my inbox in chronological order, which means I answered Bill's posts before seeing jla's, which is obvious if you look at the times of my responses. I responded to Bill's last post about 10:32, and to jla's post at 10:38. If Bill had only thought it through, instead of being determined to attack me, he would have spared himself embarrassment, and not pissed me off royally........