SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Bob Kim who wrote (146002)8/22/2002 1:25:23 PM
From: H James Morris  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164685
 
Bob, are you talking about Peter "the great" Caruso?
>>August 22, 2002

NEW YORK – Three months after agreeing to pay a $100 million fine and revamp its stock analyst research practices, Merrill Lynch & Co. fired a top retail analyst for allegedly tipping off clients that he planned to reduce an earnings estimate.

The nation's biggest brokerage fired Peter Caruso "because he violated the firm's policy regarding disclosure of an earnings estimate change and due to a loss of management confidence," Merrill Lynch said in a statement Thursday.

Caruso downgraded Home Depot shares on July 12 to "neutral" from "strong buy" and reduced his 2002 earnings estimate for the Atlanta-based company.

But Caruso suggested a day earlier to institutional investors that he might reduce the earnings estimate, said a source familiar with Caruso's firing who spoke on condition of anonymity.

Home Depot shares fell nearly 6 percent on July 11 and dropped more than 7 percent on July 12.

Caruso's lawyer, Julian Friedman, didn't immediately return a telephone message seeking comment.

Merrill Lynch agreed to the fine and the analyst reforms after New York Attorney General Eliot Spitzer revealed a 10-month investigation that uncovered e-mails from Merrill Lynch analysts disparaging stocks that they publicly praised.<<
Btw
I think LOW is a better buy than HD.
finance.yahoo.com



To: Bob Kim who wrote (146002)8/22/2002 1:29:28 PM
From: Oeconomicus  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 164685
 
Hi, Bob. Saw that. PR stunt, that's all. ;-)

Seriously, good for ML. Just wanted to beat the cynics to the punch. I do wonder if he would've been fired or, instead, gotten a bonus in a different environment, though. Sadly, most likely that latter.

Regards.