Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: tejek who wrote (150184)	8/22/2002 4:40:34 PM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1583505

He is saying there is whole section of possible actions in between the two extremes that is worth exploring. I see. I'm not sure what they would be. Admitting the weapons inspectors? At which time the new inspectors would go to Iraqi officials and say, "How about you tell me where your WMD are...". Uh, I don't think so. Cutting a deal? Something like the '91 ceasefire agreement, where Iraq agrees to do something and we agree to do something? I don't think so ... they don't have a really good track record here. I don't believe thinking people will see any alternative. It is essential that we (1) kill Saddam Hussein, and (2) after doing so, take control of his WMD. Unless someone has a different specific game plan, I'm not sure what else would solve the problem. Did you have an idea?