Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ilaine who wrote (39595)	8/23/2002 1:21:15 PM
From: JohnM	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 281500

Hmm, are you saying that if I disagree with you, you will take it personally. I hope not. Your post about Steyn was not one that encouraged any conversation about it. I didn't take it as a personal attack; just that you didn't wish to talk; just toss a bit of mud. On the Krugman piece, I thought we were both way OT. You felt that in the 89 Bush Rangers stuff, his role as a president's son was not relevant to his later $12 million. I thought that was why he was selected and was directly comparable to the Whitewater stuff. If you object to one, you should object to both. I, frankly, don't like either, but it is the way of the rather tight interface, in some places, between politics and business. Neither should be worth some 60 or 70 million dollars of tax payer money to investigate them. But that's old stuff. I gather you agree with the WSJ op ed piece on women. Steyn aside. Do I gather correctly?

To: Ilaine who wrote (39595)	8/23/2002 1:39:53 PM
From: KLP	Respond to of 281500

That picture is one that makes my eyes tear every time I see it...The horror of it...it says everything about the human condition we find ourselves in today.