Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (169918)	8/24/2002 12:26:08 AM
From: burn2learn	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Dan3, I like to think I have an open mind on issues and try to view all sides. I have one thing to say..watch some daytime talk shows....I feel you need this drama in your life. You don't live for reality. Your mind needs silliness to fulfill that something that is missing. Are you really an 8 year old boy and just naive in your views on the world. Being someone that has to apply logic to get solutions approved I have no clue how your mind works other than thinking you are a child. I know you will say I'm a brainwashed borg unit, but my god read our post....you are silly. I like to read your post sometimes to get alternative thinking but sometimes ...wow

To: Dan3 who wrote (169918)	8/24/2002 7:52:27 AM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Danysterical, re: We'll see who's hysterical after the conclusive evidence of Intel fraud, just released, is used in the class action lawsuit filed against Intel last month. Very farfetched, but lets assume for a moment that the lawsuit against Intel is successful. The absolute, certain next step would be a similar suit against AMD, with the phony Modelhurtz scheme as the centerpiece. And if AMD lost, in it's current financial situation... well the creditors would be picking the last bits of meat off the bones of AMD after the bankruptcy. The equity owner would get zilch, and AMD would be no more. So let's be careful what we wish for... John

To: Dan3 who wrote (169918)	8/24/2002 1:35:42 PM
From: tcmay	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

Which is more fraudulent?: * Labelling a PC as running at 2.53 GHz, which is what it actually runs at, or, * Labelling a PC as a "2600+", which is _not_ what it actually runs at? Intel has a powerful defense in this typical lawyer lawsuit: it says its machines run at 2.2 GHz, 2.4 GHz, 2.6 GHz, etc....and, surprise, they actually DO run at these speeds. How fast they run applications is for benchmark voodoo ninjas to argue about. (But the results for the P4 are clearly very, very good as compared to the fastest Athwipes.) AMD is the one who should be running scared. Not only can their fastest Athwipes not keep up, but they started falsely implying that their macines are running at "2600 MHz," the clear insinuation of the "2600+" moniker (or should I use the word "monica"?). --Tim May