SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Strategies & Market Trends : Zeev's Turnips - No Politics -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Timothy Liu who wrote (98548)8/25/2002 1:22:42 AM
From: mishedlo  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99280
 
the company should realize a gain first

Realize a gain?
Gain on what.
Options had to be bought.
A better way of thinking about this is a company should have to BUY leap calls.
Company gives leap calls to employees (with strings attacahed based on performence, staying with the company or whatever).

Those calls IT HAD TO BUY.
Those calls are an expense.
That expense should be taken IMMEDIATELY.
In most cases the company is acting as its own broker by being the market maker.
Those calls still cost the company something IF and when they are exercised (and that is where accounting gets sort of muddled). The options may expire worthless and thus there is no expense. The options may increase in value so taking an expense based on black sholes at the time of issue might way underestimate the actual expense down the road. The simple solution to this mess is have the company buy leap calls (end of problem immediately as surely EVEN YOU sees this as an expense), or account for the options at intrinsic value which can change quarter to quarter but the accounting is easy.

But NOWHERE ANYWHERE was there EVER any gain to the company EVER in any conceivable fashion casue the company did not sell options it BOUGHT THEM, either with hard cash or company stock, or when exercised with stock at the market.

No matter which way you turn it is an expense.

Gain on selling options.
Where the H is the sale?
This is totally nuts.

M



To: Timothy Liu who wrote (98548)8/26/2002 11:26:50 AM
From: Casaubon  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 99280
 
Doh! You blew it.

The option is not a cost of company but a transfer of wealth from shareholders to employees.

If that were true, then there would be nothing to expense.