Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Joe NYC who wrote (169984)	8/25/2002 2:36:48 AM
From: wanna_bmw	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Joe, speaking of "perspective", I haven't seen much from you in your past several posts, except for adding more fuel to the flame wars. wbmw

To: Joe NYC who wrote (169984)	8/25/2002 7:01:59 AM
From: Road Walker	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Joe, Get over it. John

To: Joe NYC who wrote (169984)	8/25/2002 12:33:43 PM
From: Dan3	Respond to of 186894

Re: Here is Paul's perspective LOL!! Nice collection. It's interesting to note the explosion of posts on the thread since Intel got caught cheating on benchmarks. The Intel longs must be terrified - It's doubtful that Intel will be directly destroyed by penalties from the class action lawsuit, but the ensuing publicity could lop $75 off their APS, which would cost them $9 Billion in annual revenue (with no reduction in costs). Intel and AMD sell what are, functionally, almost identical products. Intel has been getting $150 for each part, due to inertia and performance claims, while AMD has been getting $65. Intel's ASPs may drop to more like $75 - a quite possible outcome of publicity about Intel's faking performance claims for P4, at the same time Athlon-64 offers an alternative with real performance. Hence the volume of posts from the numerous Intel fanboys and employees on this thread.