Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: steve harris who wrote (170004)	8/25/2002 12:55:36 PM
From: limtex	Respond to of 186894

SH - Yet another downgrade forecasting more quarters of declining earnings and revenues and reductions in Cap Ex. Worse they are now forecasting gloom for 03 as well. Anyone got a view when INTC starts growing again, if ever. Best, l

To: steve harris who wrote (170004)	8/25/2002 1:17:52 PM
From: Elmer	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Stevie, you're slipping dangerously close to a Dan3 mentality. You can do better than this. You can actually make sense once in a while. Why not come back to reality? EP

To: steve harris who wrote (170004)	8/25/2002 5:28:19 PM
From: Yousef	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 186894

Steve, Re: "Thinking the consumer was too stupid to pay any attention to P4 benchmarks seems to continue the pattern of bonehead management decisions." Yes, Steve ... I was in Best Buy the other day and overheard two gentlemen in their 50's discussing the "pros and cons" of BapCo benchmarks. You really are a "maroon", Steve. AMD uses "ModelHurtz" to intentionally deceive the consumer ... It' just a "made up" number. To finish my Best Buy story ... The gentlemen put this confusing discussion aside and decided to buy "Intel Inside" at the highest frequency of operation. Make It So, Yousef