To: Jamey who wrote (89080 ) 8/25/2002 3:24:24 PM From: E. Charters Respond to of 116753 Algonquin Park, which is as large as the entire US national forest lands (:)) was logged by 3 companies selectively for 100 years. It was a protected area for all species except fish. The forest was largely clear understory, like you would expect a park to be. Great old trees towered abundantly through the park and wild animals flourished throughout, almost to the point of being pests. In time, our politicians in their greater wisdom, decided to stop this noble and successful experiment in forest mangement, and in craven fear of imagined resource depradation, they stopped all logging in the park. Elsewhere, throughout the province, where professors of forestry's theories reigned supreme, the darling technique of clear cutting had left the regeneration of Ontario's forests in ruin. Species were disappearing and vast areas of land lay fallow. Available trees were getting smaller, and replanting was not taking hold. The starkly simple and plainly obvious lesson could not be seen for the prejudice and pride of the fonts of scientific disaster. Also, within the green community they lobbied politically to "save the forests, stop old growth logging" and let the coniferous areas climax. Their reasons were never abundantly clear vis a vis doing good for the forest itself. A number of things are abundantly clear from 500 years of experience in the Black Forest in Germany and 100 years in Canada. 1. It is impossible to replant a forest and maintain a steady state of growth in all kinds of micro-environments. Rock and swamp do not replant. These are 50% of the forest area. 2. One genetic type and one age of tree, no matter how hardy, cannot survive in a forest. Variability is needed in the gene pool. Present methods of replanting are doomed to fail 3. Clear cut logging and replanting is only moderately successful in some areas, as it eliminate shade and species that are vital to interact with a developing forest. 4. Selectively logged forests can achieve steady state growth with no harm to species or the forest. 5. Large clear areas are subject to die back and desertification and are not good areas to regnerate trees. They also eliminate animal species that need cover and feed. EC<:-}