SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Ilaine who wrote (39871)8/25/2002 7:22:13 PM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
Name the President who said this: >>Well, the United States does not relish
moving alone, because we live in a world that is increasingly
interdependent. We would like to be partners with other people. But
sometimes we have to be prepared to move alone. You used the
anthrax example. Think how many can be killed by just a tiny bit of
anthrax, and think about how it's not just that Saddam Hussein might
put it on a Scud missile, an anthrax head, and send it on to some city
he wants to destroy. Think about all the other terrorists and other
bad actors who could just parade through Baghdad and pick up
their stores if we don't take action. I far prefer the United Nations, I
far prefer the inspectors, I have been far from trigger-happy on this
thing, but if they really believe that there are no circumstances under
which we would act alone, they are sadly mistaken. That is not a
threat. I have shown I do not relish this thing. Every time it's
discussed around here, I say one of the great luxuries of being the
world's only superpower for a while -- and it won't last forever
probably, but for a while -- is that there is always time enough to
kill. And therefore we have a moral responsibility to show restraint
and to seek partnerships and alliances, and I've done that. But I
don't have to explain to my grandchildren why we took a powder on
what we think is a very serious biological and chemical weapons
programs potentially by a country that has already used chemical
weapons on the Iranians and on the Kurds, their own people. <<

.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
.
Bill Clinton.
pbs.org



To: Ilaine who wrote (39871)8/25/2002 7:35:04 PM
From: Hawkmoon  Respond to of 281500
 
Pravda makes fun of Thierry Meyssan and 9/11

Hey.. don't knock it CB... The guy is making a ton of moola!!!

Heck, I'm almost tempted to undertake a similar project, maybe naming Saddam as a deep cover Mossad agent, placed there to create an atmosphere of tension that would justify and facilitate a Zionist conquest of the middle east...

Of course, I wouldn't write it under my own name... :0)

Hawk@nomdeplume.com

(Alternate: Hawk@suckerborneverysecond.org)