Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Pastimes : THE SLIGHTLY MODERATED BOXING RING -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jlallen who wrote (19861)	8/26/2002 12:41:02 AM
From: E	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 21057

You sure make odd leaps. It is surely right for you to point out that the Roe vs Wade case used in legalizing abortion contained lies and distortions that created an emotional appeal unwarranted by the true specifics of that case. Why shouldn't you? That is the ignominious fact. How you jump from that to a "right" to kill abortion doctors I can't imagine. You have an odd way of thinking. Of course we have to abide by the machinations, and the decision of the Supreme Court, that gave the victory to your man, whatever we think of it. I've never even raised the subject until someone who did was told he shouldn't. Tell the world that the Roe vs Wade case was tainted by lies about the specifics of the case and that the election of Bush was tainted in other ways, ways that taint the court itself. But both are the law of the land and we should abide by them. Sometimes the better tricksters win the game.