Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: wanna_bmw who wrote (170063)	8/26/2002 2:00:20 AM
From: Joe NYC	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

wbmw, It's not false that they've hidden the fact that they went to Tom first, and that he turned them down. AMD makes it look like they just happened to stumble on this "discovery" over the last couple weeks, but in fact, they've known for months that SysMark 2002 was using different scripts, but they were waiting for a reviewer to spill the beans to make it look more credible. So it took AMD 4 months to find Van Smith? Interesting theory, should I say diversion. You are doing a very good job of changing the subject from: "Is Intel committing fraud by misrepresenting their creation BapCo (Intel's PR arm) as an independent testing organization, while it is deliberately deceiving public in order to secure unfair gain." Into: "How did AMD inform the world of this Intel deception" Joe