Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Technical Analysis for Macintosh Users -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Sbtorres who wrote (905)	8/28/2002 1:13:55 AM
From: PuddleGlum	Respond to of 1541

I've heard of AIM before, and after huge bears like we had/are having I suppose AIM would gain many converts. But how well might an AIM investor have done in 2001? Or so far in 2002? My system would have netted 147% in 2001, and 51% so far in 2002. The proof will be in how this system performs from here on out, and in what I discover about how well it performed in years prior to 2001, but this is the type of performance that makes one strive for something better than AIM. -pg

To: Sbtorres who wrote (905)	12/16/2002 10:14:56 PM
From: PuddleGlum	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1541

Still no word on the OSX version of ProTA. I might get a shot at being a beta tester, but since I haven't heard anything more since I offered, I'll guess that the OSX version is another 6 months out there. b. xu is suggesting that people take short positions on any strength. Our systems tend to be in agreement more often than not, which has me holding more cash than I usually like to hold, but still with a substantial long position. I've been taking my market-derived data and importing it into ProTA to generate another indicator.