Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Qualcomm Moderated Thread - please read rules before posting -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ramsey Su who wrote (26049)	8/26/2002 8:42:52 AM
From: Kent Rattey	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 196849

We still need Alcatel to pony up.

To: Ramsey Su who wrote (26049)	8/26/2002 8:50:09 AM
From: foundation	Respond to of 196849

"License Now Includes Infrastructure Equipment for All* CDMA Standards -; - Subscriber License Covers Subscriber Units for UMTS (WCDMA) Standards"* The implication is that Siemens is licensed for TD-SCDMA infrastructure, whether thay like it or not. <g> But regarding subscriber license, TD-SCDMA is not UMTSwCDMA. They're all under the ITU IMT2000 umbrella, but TD-SCDMA is not under a UMTSwCDMA umbrella. Do Q IP attorneys feel confident that Siemens is sufficiently "pregnant" with infrastructure that they can bludgeon a subscriber license out of Siemens in the unlikely event that the standard evolves? Does the language allow Siemens to save face? Does it inspire new hope for waning TD-SCDMA in China or Germany?