SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (40033)8/26/2002 3:53:03 PM
From: JohnM  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
This sounds as if you agree that it would be useless for Israel to try to "take the lead" as long as Arafat is in place and irreplaceable...don't look now, we may have found some common ground.

Whoops, the sound of speedy back peddling. ;-)

No, I didn't mean that. I rather meant that, and this won't happen, the US and Israel would take the public leadership role but try to work with other elements in the PA at the same time to transfer the negotiating process away from Arafat into other's hands.

Perhaps that's not possible. My objection to the present approach is that it leaves the US and Israel in the not so admirable position of trying to publicly force the Palestinians to change their leadership. That tends to produce the opposite results.



To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (40033)8/26/2002 4:01:11 PM
From: Chas.  Respond to of 281500
 
I think you are correct and that one must go back to the days of T.E.Lawrence to see properly the big picture or as you say the wider text....
Palestine has been essentially abandoned since the 50s by Saudi Arabia, Jordan, Syria, Iraq, Egypt etc........
there will never be co-existence in Israel without a meaningful relationship with the Arab world at large, a short term solution maybe but short term...

Chuck