Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Nadine Carroll who wrote (40058)	8/26/2002 5:12:01 PM
From: Eashoa' M'sheekha	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

Thanks For The Clarification. However, I'm sure you are aware that not everyone in " The United States of America " support " your " position, and may not appreciate that blanket approach to policy analysis? Many, if not most here, use the third person or object to deal with analysis. IE: The current administration , the president , the military , the opposition party ( Democrats in this case )…etc..etc….. To state “ we “ and “ us “ and “ our “ assumes there is a unanimity and the actions and policy are one, yet , as we have witnessed, there are differences of opinion even within the current administration. So the use of those terms may be erroneous and insulting to those Americans who may not agree with you, whatever position you may take. Not trying to be picky here , but thought you might like to be reminded of the appropriateness of your choice of those possessive forms when projecting your position(s). F.Y.I.