SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?


To: Harold Engstrom who wrote (170118)8/26/2002 5:37:15 PM
From: wanna_bmw  Respond to of 186894
 
Harold, Re: "Is this true for servers as well? I mean, most servers are PIII - will P4 or 64-bit CPU servers be out soon?"

The P4 servers are called "Xeon". There used to be a "Pentium III Xeon" name brand, but Intel dropped the "Pentium X" part of it when they moved to the P4 core. As for 64-bit servers, those are called Itanium 2, but right now, software availability prohibits a lot of mainstream use. You might see Itanium 2 used in high performance compute clusters at scientific or educational organizations, and they will eventually move on to enterprise database and solution based software by the end of the year. You may not see them in SMB segments for a few more years.

wbmw



To: Harold Engstrom who wrote (170118)8/26/2002 6:08:53 PM
From: Robert Salasidis  Read Replies (2) | Respond to of 186894
 
Servers are a different matter, and which CPU you buy depends on your application. If you are dealing with small amounts of transactions, then a Xeon processor (or a dual Xeon) would be the way to go.

www.supermicro.com

these guys sell a varity of dual Xeon motherboards you can use to put together a decent low cost server.

For a few $ extra you can buy an Adaptec SCSI PCI-X RAID controller. Buy 4-5 Cheetah 15kRPM drives, and you have yourself a top line harddrive for the server as well.

If your application requires more than a dual Xeon has to offer, then Itanium is an option, but the cost is significantly higher. You would have to go to the likes of HP and IBM for those.



To: Harold Engstrom who wrote (170118)8/26/2002 7:27:57 PM
From: Jim McMannis  Respond to of 186894
 
Are you attached to Intel or can you go AMD?