Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: jcky who wrote (40084)	8/26/2002 6:06:11 PM
From: KLP	Respond to of 281500

It certainly helps to do your reading more carefully. In fact, myself, and I would believe, several others here are not "so intent on an invasion"....I would like in fact, to just live and let live...pull the blanket over my head, and not deal with terrible people. However, that doesn't seem very prudent anymore, does it? We've been doing that now for the past 10 years~~~just see where that policy brought us. So, again, how do you think we should contain Saddam? Flyovers might not be the strongest evidence.....Perhaps going to his underground bunkers and checking out the labs everywhere would help....suppose? jcky: An aggressive containment policy with a no fly zone is not just sitting around. But since you're so intent on invasion, I hear the Marines are still looking a few good men. KLP: If one or several of our cities are vaporized, and/or cities throughout the world contact Ebola or smallpox or whatever else.... jcky: Oh, I see... Saddam is just going to give away his small pox virus (if he even has it) to terrorists who are intent on using them against Americans. In the process he is signing his own death sentence, and we all know what a martyr Saddam really is at heart.