Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: JohnM who wrote (40107)	8/26/2002 8:00:30 PM
From: Nadine Carroll	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 281500

It would produce the one set of conditions in which Saddam Hussein, faced with the certain death and the destruction of his country, would have the greatest incentive to strike back with any means at his disposal, including the arming of al Qaeda. That's a good point -- if you think he hasn't done this already. If the argument is, that Saddam has the stuff and the Al Qaeda connections all ready, he just won't give it over until the last extremity, it doesn't sound like a stable or acceptable situation that's being overturned. btw, the US doesn't intend to destroy Iraq, Saddam doesn't care about the destruction of Iraq.