Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Formerly About Advanced Micro Devices -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Alighieri who wrote (150415)	8/27/2002 8:38:28 AM
From: i-node	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 1584934

By the president men's policies it should be ok for either India or Pakistan to execute pre-emptive actions against one another. It is very difficult to argue with the logic of pre-emption. If you don't do it pre-emptively, you can't do it at all. Had someone intervened with Pakistan and India, there would be no concern about them today. To suggest that Iraq is not a "sworn enemy" of the United States is silly. It is obvious from his actions that Saddam's hatred for the United States and his beligerence in disgegarding international law makes us his "sworn enemy". Al, we have come to this position with Iraq to a large extent because of failures of the previous administration. I think Cheney's speech made it clear that Bush doesn't want to leave it to risk that another weak administration will allow us to get into further trouble. To me, that is a prudent position.