SI
SI
discoversearch

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor.  We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community.  If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.
Politics : Foreign Affairs Discussion Group -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: LindyBill who wrote (40225)8/27/2002 10:48:09 AM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
I put militant Islam in the same category as the KKK, neo-nazis, skinheads, and the like. We tolerate a lot of those loony-tunes running around loose, in, say, Montana and Idaho. I hope the FBI is keeping an eye on them, but if they don't break any laws, let them preach their message of hatred as much as they want. It's good for us to hear them so we know where they are coming from.



To: LindyBill who wrote (40225)8/27/2002 10:59:19 AM
From: Ilaine  Read Replies (1) | Respond to of 281500
 
On second thought, maybe tolerance of militant Islam isn't such a good idea after all: Something Rotten in Denmark?
danielpipes.org

The test for free speech in America can be summed up as the "clear and present danger" test. Does the speech present a clear and present danger that violence will ensue as a result? If so, it is prohibited. If not, it is permitted.

Boy, that is a liberty that I would deeply regret losing. It's one of my favorites.


HomeMailHotSubjectMarksPeopleMarksKeepersSettings
Terms Of UseContact UsCopyright/IP PolicyPrivacy PolicyAbout UsFAQAdvertise on SI
© 2025 Knight Sac Media.  Data provided by Twelve Data, Alpha Vantage, and CityFALCON News