Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Biotech / Medical : XOMA. Bull or Bear? -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: aknahow who wrote (16007)	8/27/2002 11:55:42 PM
From: LarryS	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 17367

Oops...thanks for the backup George. I have heard so little from BAX I almost forgot them. Another thing George, while the SEC is doing all their investigations maybe they will look at contracts with secret clauses by XOMA and others where only a few insiders know what they contain. And only they can trade on the information. The SEC is investigating a company now that issued options to their senior mgmt, not based on doing a superior job, but because they knew the price would soon jump based on their inside knowledge of the particulars of a contract that only they knew....and they wanted to take financial advantage of their unique knowledge. Supposedly the BOD didn't even know it and just rubber stamped mgmt's request. Sounded like they will have to give back their ill gotten gains. Don't know why these guys aren't blackballed or sent to jail. I think XOMA should release the info on BAX's contract to the owners (shareholders) so we can make wise investment decisions. If not the SEC should looks into why this information is withheld. And who cares if they do it for competitive advantage or because that is how things have always been done by biotechs.

To: aknahow who wrote (16007)	8/28/2002 11:08:34 AM
From: Robert K.	Respond to of 17367

Well George, in a sense, dna was involved in natural bpi from the get go. Thats maybe 1989 or so.

To: aknahow who wrote (16007)	8/29/2002 3:55:30 PM
From: Cacaito	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 17367

Check at Allp news, they are breaking with PFC (Baxter co venture with Allp) because of their breach of contract, boycott of Oxygent development (they ask for more extensive and expensive development, then ask for Allp to ante up more money) and then they are not giving the money as per contractual obligation. Allp TAKES back the rights to Oxygent. But, the $150 millions manufacturing plant is in Baxterd hands, they can make air conditioner fluid with it, but no medical products, anyway the baxtards are keeping it. North American Vaccine plant and intelectual property ended up in bax hands in simmilar way, but the company dissapeared completely. Bpi is on standby, the development is minimal to keep garbaxter from breach of contract, boycott is the name of the game, to see if they could steal it fair and square. I hope that Jack C has the same guts to deal with Bax that he had to deal with the shareholders. I hope that xoma makes enough money to keep the beaxtretard away from bpi. Man, I do not believe I would have ever has Jack C in higher steamboat than anyone else, but the bax is the worse around. PLEASE JACK, TAKE BPI BACK !!!