Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (291038)	8/28/2002 12:12:36 AM
From: DuckTapeSunroof	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

You are following a stale trail now (several days old) but if you are interested regarding my follow-up post to 'Pro': "You answered in the negative on my first question, and refused to answer the second. And you, Tom ask: "On the first question which is?" >>> Simply follow the thread back to the beginning. I clearly identified my two questions at least twice in different posts, and I fail to see how anyone could conclude that 'Pro' answered either directly. >>> If you can find direct answers to my simple and direct questions, then by all means show them. >>> I believe that what you will find is a sly side-stepping of direct answers by 'Pro', which can be interpreted various ways: 1) perhaps he can't answer. 2) perhaps he refuses to answer. 3) (and even more speculatively) perhaps he is ashamed that a direct answer would expose his inconsistency on implementing his stated (totalistic) view that All people should be punished for breaking the 'law'. Truth to tell, he appears to pick and choose which laws to respect - which is a very common point of view, and one I have yet to dispute.