Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Amazon.com, Inc. (AMZN) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (146404)	8/28/2002 11:24:10 AM
From: H James Morris	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 164684

LOL! Aol has got its own problems. I bought AOL @ 12 so I think I know. >>SAN DIEGO (CBS.MW) -- The browser war, which ran hot and heavy for an interval in the 1990s, is all but over, according to researchers at WebSideStory. The firm, which tracks the activities of millions of Internet users, said Wednesday that 96 percent of surfers use Internet Explorer, the browser developed by Microsoft (MSFT: news, chart, profile), compared to 3.4 percent for Netscape. "The browser war is in fact a massacre," said Geoff Johnston, vice president of StatMarket, a WebSideStory unit. "The newest versions of Netscape have failed to win over users." AOL Time Warner (AOL: news, chart, profile) acquired Netscape several years ago. "Unless AOL makes a move soon, Netscape may find itself battling Opera for the last 1 or 2 percent of the market," Johnston said. A year ago, Netscape was used by 13 percent of Web surfers. << Btw I wonder if Billy is still using Netscape's browser?

To: Glenn D. Rudolph who wrote (146404)	8/28/2002 11:35:39 AM
From: H James Morris	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 164684

February 3, 1999 Fueled by e-commerce mania, normally staid institutional investors vied frantically to get in on Amazon.com's (AMZN ) recent junk bond offering, despite unattractive terms and a poor credit rating. In response to this demand, Amazon increased its offering size from an initial $500 million to a monstrous $1.25 billion. Keith Benjamin, a managing director with BancBoston Robertson Stephens, attributes the frenzied investor response to the lack of Internet deals in the convertible bond market. "My sense is that there isn't a lot of supply at the moment." He adds, "If you're a convertible investor, there aren't that many high-flying convertible growths." BOND LINGO What are these investors actually buying? Amazon's debt offering consists of 10-year bonds with a coupon, or interest rate, of 4.75 percent. The bonds are convertible to stock at $156.05 a share. This is more expensive and, therefore, priced at a premium to the current share price of $125.75 (as of market close on Wednesday, February 3). According to Moody's Investors Service, Amazon's bond offering has a credit rating of Caa3. This rating represents the company's projected capability to pay the interest and principal on the bonds. Since its rating is below BBB, Amazon's bonds are considered below investment grade; these types of bonds are also known as high-yield or "junk" bonds. A high-yield bond usually carries a high interest rate to compensate the investor for the risk involved. Generally, the weaker a company's financial condition, the more it must pay to borrow money. IGNORING RISK Reflecting the Internet frenzy and the current disregard for profitability, another Wall Street rule is being ignored. Amazon is raising this debt to finance the building of physical infrastructure, such as distribution centers. Although profitability is still elusive and more debt further weakens the company's tenuous balance sheet, the company is getting cheap money. Its bonds will not cost the company much in the way of interest, and its convertible price currently values Amazon shares well above the current trading price. Yet even with unattractive terms, institutional investors still demanded more bonds than the company supplied. The growth potential for a flagship Internet retailer appears to be the key reason for this disregard for risk. As Mr. Benjamin maintains, the potential for a "phenomenal future" for Amazon is more important to investors than a weak balance sheet.