Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: NITT who wrote (170225)	8/28/2002 12:47:11 PM
From: Ali Chen	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 186894

"but if what is documented in the testing is indeed correct regardless of which function BABCO chooses to test, then no fraud has occurred." You must be missing the point. So far not much has been documented on BAPCO methods or workloads, only blatant statements that it reflects "typical PC usage". The fraud seems to be occurring when the "typical usage" has "suddenly" shifted to include and multiply only those rare functions that are performing better on P4. And this was discovered by hacking the benchmark, not through any "documentation". "..is that companies do a much better job of documenting the details behind the benchmark" Here you go again... - Ali