Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Strategies & Market Trends : Classic TA Workplace -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: AllansAlias who wrote (51485)	8/28/2002 12:42:29 PM
From: The Freep	Read Replies (2) \| Respond to of 209892

As ancillary observational stuff. . . all I see here are shorts covering and talking about possible long entries (though most are still avoiding that). I see no bear crowing. I see no scared longs. Both of these things exist, no doubt, but I'm just talking what I'm seeing on a handful of boards I like to check. I find this rather interesting. Bears have been burned lately, and some are glad for profits or getting even or close. None seem to pay much heed to the fact that banks MAY be breaking down here and that we have fallen hard on non-tech after finally breaking the uptrend lines (oh, and that small S+P h+s which points down another 20 S+P points). Naz below the trendline, too. Everyone thinking this is just a fakeout? It might just be, that's for sure. Still, what's it mean? I don't kno, cuz I'm confused, but I do find it intriguing. the freep

To: AllansAlias who wrote (51485)	8/28/2002 12:46:47 PM
From: augieboo	Respond to of 209892

Of course not! I'm still chasing the charts around trying to find the perfect entry for a combination of RYTPX, RYVNX, RYAIX, and RYURX. {g/ng} Plus, just 'cuz I can read the market, (assuming I'm right), doesn't mean I can trade for beans. Unfortunately, I've found that the former does not necessarily imply the later. {NG}