Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : PRESIDENT GEORGE W. BUSH -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (291152)	8/28/2002 2:08:43 PM
From: calgal	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

U.N.'s Annan joins calls for restraint on Iraq GABORONE, Botswana (AP) — U.N. Secretary-General Kofi Annan urged the United States to resist attacking Iraq, joining calls from leaders in Germany, China, Saudi Arabia and Bahrain on Wednesday for restraint in considering military action to topple Saddam Hussein. The stepped-up opposition to a military strike against Iraq came after Vice President Dick Cheney on Monday warned that the United States could face devastating consequences from any delay in acting to remove Iraq's government, which Washington accuses of trying to rebuild its banned weapons programs. On Tuesday, Annan said he favored ongoing dialogue with Saddam's government and that if Washington decides to attack Iraq it would not reflect U.N. policy. "The U.N. is not agitating for military action" against Iraq, Annan told a news conference after talks with Botswana's President Festus Mogae. In Germany, Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and Foreign Minister Joschka Fischer on Wednesday renewed their criticism of plans to use military force against Saddam. Schroeder insisted that Germany wouldn't take part in an attack — "at least not under my leadership." Fischer told German radio that "with no change in the analysis of the threat posed by Iraq, we believe a regime change brought about by military intervention to be highly risky and its consequences unclear, which is why we reject it." In China, Iraqi Foreign Minister Naji Sabri met with Vice Premier Qian Qichen on Wednesday in an effort to drum up support for Baghdad from a traditional ally. Qian reportedly said he opposed U.S. military action against Iraq. In the meeting, Qian repeated China's demand that Iraq implement U.N. Security Council resolutions calling for the return of U.N. arms inspectors, the official Xinhua News Agency reported. Xinhua also quoted Qian as saying that "China does not agree with the practice of using force or threatening to use force to resolve this issue." Saudi Arabia, a key U.S. ally in the region, on Wednesday repeated its opposition to a military attack on Iraq, saying Washington should insist on a return of weapons inspectors. In an interview with the British Broadcasting Corp., Saudi Foreign Minister Prince Saud al-Faisal said: "Attacking the Iraqi people will force them into backing their government." Bahrain's king, Sheik Hamad bin Isa Al Khalifa, reiterated his country's opposition to U.S. military action against Iraq. The official Syrian Arab News Agency said that during a visit to Syria on Wednesday, Sheik Hamad urged Iraq to comply with U.N. resolutions and spare the region "further tensions and suffering." With key allies balking at a possible U.S. attack on Iraq, Deputy Secretary of State Richard Armitage stumped for support in Japan on Wednesday and indicated Washington was just getting started on building a coalition against Baghdad. Armitage declined to say how many nations back Washington's push for toppling Saddam. "I don't think I'd care to give a laundry list because I don't think we've choosed sides yet on the question of who would do what," Armitage told a news conference wrapping up a five-nation Asia tour in Tokyo. "When the U.S. lays out a public case against Iraq, we expect to have a fair amount of international support," Armitage said. Cheney on Monday argued that a pre-emptive strike to stop Saddam from developing chemical, biological or nuclear weapons was necessary. "What we must not do in the face of a mortal threat is to give in to wishful thinking or willful blindness," he said. In Britain, the main U.S. ally, Prime Minister Tony Blair and other officials have repeatedly said it is too early to make a decision about whether to participate in such an attack. On Wednesday, a spokesman for Blair said on condition of anonymity that Britain has "100% agreed with the U.S. that you have to deal with the issue of weapons of mass destruction." He added, however, that "equally, there is a route for Saddam to resolve the issue by giving unfettered access to U.N. inspectors and for him to comply with U.N. resolutions." Sanctions were imposed on Iraq after its 1990 invasion of Kuwait, and cannot be lifted until U.N. inspectors certify that Iraq's nuclear, biological and chemical weapons programs have been dismantled along with the long-range missiles to deliver them. Inspectors left Baghdad ahead of U.S. and British airstrikes in December 1998 to punish Iraq for not cooperating with inspections. Iraq has barred them from returning. The United Nations has failed to persuade Iraq to readmit the inspectors despite three rounds of talks since March. Iraq said it wants to continue a dialogue on their return — but with conditions Annan has rejected. While U.S. officials have said they are not rushing into a war with Iraq, they have not ruled out the use of military action either. In Iraq, officials on Wednesday gave reporters a tour of a site said to be suspected of producing chemical and biological agents but which Baghdad insists makes insecticides for home and farm use. It was the third such visit by reporters this month. Officials said the Falluja-3 plant, located 65 miles west of Baghdad, was destroyed by U.S. warplanes in 1991 and 1998 and rebuilt each time. Reporters saw no signs of damage. usatoday.com

To: Thomas A Watson who wrote (291152)	8/28/2002 2:20:36 PM
From: Mr. Whist	Read Replies (1) \| Respond to of 769670

Re: "I donot (sic) believe those killer (sic) were tortured to make them confess." My source regarding systematic torture in the Spanish Inquisition is the Oxford Encyclopedia. Your source is your personal opinion based on your personal research. We'll let the board decide whom to believe: the Oxford Encyclopedia or Nutty Tommy's personal research. I heard a similar rebuttal re: the Spanish Inquisition from some right-wing priest on EWTN, the Catholic cable TV channel, a few months ago. I ended up actually laughing at some of his lame arguments. The Catholic Church, and you, would be far better served to admit that, yes, the mother church has some dark episodes in its past, and then move on ... rather than try to rewrite history. It smacks too much of what Emile and others are attempting to do to pretend that the Holocaust never happened.