Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Ali Chen who wrote (170272)	8/29/2002 12:51:36 AM
From: burn2learn	Read Replies (3) \| Respond to of 186894

Ali, I'm treating this as 1 point. Debate the one point without confusing with other independent points. Bottom-line, could AMD have been part of bapco? Did they apply...were they denied? Democracy..no..but if someone sells a strong point and no one is present to contest or suggest a different view then what would any team go with. I come in to a meeting with data that's critical to a decision ....maybe it's the data I want you to see and I don't offer the "other data" then if no one has the technical background OR vested interest in countering my view, then I'm sure the team would think my view is good. I don't know what happened here and I don't speak for Intel but if you are a no show then tough...it was not important enough to you to be a member and impact outcome. I see this Bapco thing as a team of semi-technical people trying to do the right thing based on the input that was available from all members. All members bought off on something based on the facts presented.