Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Technology Stocks : Intel Corporation (INTC) -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: Dan3 who wrote (170298)	8/29/2002 2:41:48 AM
From: The Duke of URL©	Respond to of 186894

"You must think that there's nothing wrong with what Enron did" Look twit, get off this bs. You are so afraid that AMD is going to be discovered without a product for the next 3 to 6 months WHILE it is losing $300MM a quarter, that you are hoping to fill the airwaves with noise about anything. What enron did in setting up the SPE's was legal. What citicorp did in lending the money was legal. What Enron did by not disclosing 15 BILLION dollars worth of loans on their balance sheet to their stockholders was fraud. What Citicorp did when it had its subsidiary Smith Barney sell Enron stock to the depositors of Citicorp bank WHILE IT WAS DUMPING 15 Billion dollars of THE SAME STOCK is a violation of the law. Bapco's duty may be as much as to disclose the intel interest. Bapco's claim is that they had a benchmark. That in your abject fear and hatred of intel is all they did. Your repeated mis-characterizations DON'T MATTER ONE WHIT and just bring you to the level of Yahoo poster. But Yahoo has no where near the ignore features of SI, although it is getting better. Which, of course, may be your ultimate purpose.