Silicon Investor (SI) -- The First Internet Community

STOCKTALK

We've detected that you're using an ad content blocking browser plug-in or feature. Ads provide a critical source of revenue to the continued operation of Silicon Investor. We ask that you disable ad blocking while on Silicon Investor in the best interests of our community. If you are not using an ad blocker but are still receiving this message, make sure your browser's tracking protection is set to the 'standard' level.

Politics : Stockman Scott's Political Debate Porch -- Ignore unavailable to you. Want to Upgrade?

To: stockman_scott who wrote (5473)	8/30/2002 10:45:28 AM
From: Jim Willie CB	Respond to of 89467

Austrian Richebacher talks (or is it Orville Reddenbacher?) my guess is Richebacher is smarter than Voltaire Richy believes the Fed caused the problem, will worse problem Volty believes the Fed created prosperity, will do so again taken from the Daily Reckoning ------- / jim Nobody was willing to admit that the success of the "new era" was anything but real. Only a handful of cranks suggested otherwise. If you "didn't get it", they said, then you just "didn't get it." And it wasn't just Americans...foreigners bought into Pax Americana like tourists on the first day of annual summer sales here in Paris - that is, in a passionate rush with arms flailing, hoping to score the deal of a lifetime. Foreign direct investments in the US markets at the end of 2001 totaled more than $3 trillion. "But looking at their miserable return," says Dr. Richebacher, "it was a gigantic malinvestment." In 1997, earnings from foreign direct investments amounted to $43 billion dollars. These peaked in 2000 at $69 billion, collapsing in 2001 to $37 billion. Rather than the 20% year over year growth they were looking for...the rate of return was a little over 2%... "Considering the miserable corporate profits, a weakening dollar, the uncertainties about a US economic recovery and the accounting scandals, it is implausible that foreigners will add more dollar denominated to their portfolios. Nobody can be so stupid," says Dr. Richebacher. "Yet the record suggests [and recent rallies prove] that at almost every point some people will be prepared to bet that the stock market or the dollar has bottomed out." But what's really going on? Rather than Pax Americana... or endless prosperity...we have the War on Terror...an impending invasion of Iraq...and a potential multi-year bear market. Where did the New Era go? "Internationally," writes Bill Buckler of the Privateer, "the Bush Administration has managed to place the U.S.A. in a next to entirely isolated position. Nobody, except Great Britain and Australia, is siding with the U.S...If a war with Iraq now does take place, the U.S. will have to wage it on its own, with some British military help. "Such a self-made global political isolation is exceptional. It is now vastly beyond anything the former communist bloc could have ever dreamt about imposing. The Bush regime has managed to accomplish it in six months." "If President Bush goes to war in the Middle East, it is for the purpose of internal U.S. distraction. Iraq is a small country bled white by a tyrant, and it is far, far away." A distraction? What could we possibly need a distraction from? As the Austrian economists - people like Dr.Richebacher and Sean Corrigan, our man-on-the-scene in London - are so fond of reminding us...following the '29 crash there was a 17-year bear market, followed by a 20-year bull market, followed by a 17-year bear market, followed by our most recent 18-year bull market. Dave Skarica, editor of a newsletter called Addicted to Profits, recently traced the cycles all the way back to 1815. With the exception of a few shorter cycles of 8 and 5 years for both bull and bear markets, the cycles generally last in the 17-20 year range. Of course, we have no idea what the future holds. But we're not afraid to take a guess. We've had a bear market for 2 years...is it likely that it will end by next year? The year after? Or will we need a major distraction to cut the cycle short? Certainly not out of the realm of the possible, is it? After the excesses of this last boom we expect we've got a few years yet of negative returns. And the greatest excess of the bubble yet to get corrected is that of the bull market in hubris that grew so large in the 90s... but correct, we suspect, it will.